The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-analyses of Big Six Interests and Big Five Personality Factors
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027 · Cited by 7,715
Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits
Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.2.219 · Cited by 1,829
Writing meta-analytic reviews.
Rosenthal, R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.2.183 · Cited by 1,108
Cited by
HIGHER‐ORDER DIMENSIONS OF THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS AND THE BIG SIX VOCATIONAL INTEREST TYPES
MOUNT, M. K., BARRICK, M. R., SCULLEN, S. M., & ROUNDS, J. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00468.x · Cited by 463
Extraversion advantages at work: A quantitative review and synthesis of the meta-analytic evidence.
Wilmot, M. P., Wanberg, C. R., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Ones, D. S. (2019) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000415 · Cited by 194
Procrastination's Impact in the Workplace and the Workplace's Impact on Procrastination
Nguyen, B., Steel, P., & Ferrari, J. R. (2013) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12048 · Cited by 167
Holland's RIASEC model as an integrative framework for individual differences.
Armstrong, P. I., Day, S. X., McVay, J. P., & Rounds, J. (2008) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.55.1.1 · Cited by 136
Occupational niches and the Dark Triad traits
Jonason, P. K., Wee, S., Li, N. P., & Jackson, C. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.024 · Cited by 135
Trait emotional intelligence profiles of students from different university faculties
Sánchez-Ruiz, M. J., Pérez-González, J. C., & Petrides, K. V. (2010) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00049530903312907 · Cited by 110
Stoll, G., Rieger, S., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., & Roberts, B. W. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000117 · Cited by 97
Vocational interests and dark personality: Are there dark career choices?
Kowalski, C. M., Vernon, P. A., & Schermer, J. A. (2017) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.029 · Cited by 64
Kleitman, S., Law, M. K. H., & Kay, J. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205089 · Cited by 51
Developmental structure of personality and interests: A four-wave, 8-year longitudinal study.
Hoff, K. A., Song, Q. C., Einarsdóttir, S., Briley, D. A., & Rounds, J. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000228 · Cited by 32
The consequences of personality biases in online panels for measuring public opinion
Valentino, N. A., Zhirkov, K., Hillygus, D. S., & Guay, B. (2021) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfaa026 · Cited by 29
Sheldon, K. M., & Corcoran, M. (2019) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-018-9723-1 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Vocational Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 217-239
- ISSN
- 0001-8791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018186797
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
