Cited by 120Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Context Specificity of Excitation and Inhibition in Ambiguous Stimuli

Nelson, James Byron·2002·Learning and Motivation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/lmot.2001.1112

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Activation of S-R is context-dependent, either because the context itself provides the S associated with R, or because the context controls the second thing learned.

    “Crucially, the activation of S-R is context-dependent, either because the context itself provides the S associated with R, or because (as we have seen in other retroactive interference paradigms) the context controls the second thing learned (e.g., Bouton, 1993; Nelson, 2002).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, J. B.
Affiliations
University of Central Arkansas (US)
Corresponding author
Nelson, James Byron
Venue
Learning and Motivation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
284-310
ISSN
0023-9690 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023039580
Cited by
120
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Learning and Motivation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
contextual specificity, context switching, appetitive conditioning, inhibitory conditioning, excitatory conditioning, occasion setting, associative learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review