Cited by 152Memory and Neural MechanismsBehavioral and Psychological StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

A fundamental role for context in instrumental learning and extinction

Open access
Bouton, Mark E., Todd, Travis P.·2014·Behavioural Processes

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review recent research that has investigated the effects of context change on instrumental (operant) learning. The first part of the article discusses instrumental extinction, in which the strength of a reinforced instrumental behavior declines when reinforcers are withdrawn. The results suggest that extinction of either simple or discriminated operant behavior is relatively specific to the context in which it is learned: As in prior studies of Pavlovian extinction, ABA, ABC, and AAB renewal effects can all be observed. Further analysis supports the idea that the organism learns to refrain from making a specific response in a specific context, or in more formal terms, an inhibitory context-response association. The second part of the article then discusses research suggesting that the context also controls instrumental behavior before it is extinguished. Several experiments demonstrate that a context switch after either simple or discriminated operant training causes a decrement in the strength of the response. Over a range of conditions, the animal appears to learn a direct association between the context and the response. Under some conditions, it can also learn a hierarchical representation of context and the response-reinforcer relation. Extinction is still more context-specific than conditioning, as indicated by ABC and AAB renewal. Overall, the results establish that the context can play a significant role in both the acquisition and extinction of operant behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.012

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bouton ME 2004 Context and behavioral processes in extinction Learning & Memory 11 485 494 15466298

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouton, M. E., & Todd, T. P.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Bouton, Mark E.
Venue
Behavioural Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
104
Pages
13-19
ISSN
0376-6357 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059811876
Cited by
152
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Processes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA033123)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
operant conditioning, operant extinction, context effects, context switching, hierarchical representation, Pavlovian extinction
MeSH terms
Association Learning, Conditioning, Operant, Extinction, Psychological, Humans, Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review