Cited by 572Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsEmpathy and Medical Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Positive Affect Facilitates Integration of Information and Decreases Anchoring in Reasoning among Physicians

Estrada, Carlos A, Isen, Alice M, Young, Mark J·1997·Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/obhd.1997.2734

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 29 references

3 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 572

Metadata

Authors
Estrada, C. A., Isen, A. M., & Young, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Henry Ford Hospital (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Venue
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-10
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
117-135
ISSN
0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047038396
Cited by
572
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 27
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
positive affect, clinical reasoning, anchoring, information integration, physicians, standardized patients, affect induction, heuristic processing, premature closure, liver disease diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review