Cited by 71Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingNutritional Studies and Diet

Can Measures of the Grocery Store Environment Be Used to Track Community-Level Dietary Changes?

Cheadle, A., Psaty, B.M., Curry, S., Wagner, E., Diehr, P., Koepsell, T., Kristal, A.·1993·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background This article examines whether an in-store unobtrusive survey of grocery store product displays can be used to track community-level dietary behavior.Methods The survey was conducted in 12 western communities two different times to measure two aspects of the grocery store environment: (a) the relative availability of low-fat and high-fiber products and (b) the amount of store-provided health-education information. Self-reported dietary intake of residents was obtained in the same 12 communities using a telephone survey. We compared the individual and store-level measures both cross-sectionally and over time.Results We found positive and statistically significant correlations between the availability of healthful products in stores and the reported healthfulness of individual diets in cross-sectional analyses, but correlations between changes over time in the two measures were weaker and not statistically significant. The variance of the grocery store measures was nonetheless sufficiently small that a grocery store survey of 15 stores in each of 8 communities (n = 120 surveys) had power comparable to that of a telephone survey of 200 individuals/community (n = 1,600) surveys, at a fraction of the cost.Conclusion Although the results provide further validation of cross-sectional measures of the grocery store environment, additional efforts are required to establish the validity of the grocery store survey as a method of measuring dietary change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/pmed.1993.1030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheadle, A., Psaty, B. M., Curry, S., Wagner, E., Diehr, P., Koepsell, T., & Kristal, A.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-05
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
361-372
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071831628
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (90-2118-06)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
retail food environment, self-reported dietary intake, survey validation
MeSH terms
Advertising, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet Surveys, Dietary Fats, Dietary Fiber, Environment, Feeding Behavior, Follow-Up Studies, Food Supply, Humans, Telephone, Reproducibility of Results, Nutritional Sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review