Cited by 217Obesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, DietPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Barriers to obesity management: a pilot study of primary care clinicians

Open access
Forman-Hoffman, Valerie, Little, Amanda, Wahls, Terry·2006·BMC Family Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity is an increasing epidemic in both the US and veteran populations, yet it remains largely understudied in the Veteran's Health Administration (VHA) setting. The purpose of our study was to identify barriers to the effective management of obesity in VHA primary care settings. METHODS: Three focus groups of clinicians from a Veteran's Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) and an affiliated Community Based Outpatient Center (CBOC) were conducted to identify potential barriers to obesity management. The focus groups and previously published studies then informed the creation of a 47-item survey that was then disseminated and completed by 55 primary care clinicians. RESULTS: The focus groups identified provider, system, and patient barriers to obesity care. Lack of obesity training during medical school and residency was associated with lower rates of discussing diet and exercise with obese patients (p < 0.05). Clinicians who watched their own diets vigorously were more likely to calculate BMI for obese patients than other clinicians (42% vs. 13%, p < 0.05). Many barriers identified in previous studies (e.g., attitudes toward obese patients, lack of insurance payments for obesity care) were not prevalent barriers in the current study. CONCLUSION: Many VHA clinicians do not routinely provide weight management services for obese patients. The most prevalent barriers to obesity care were poor education during medical school and residency and the lack of information provided by the VHA to both clinicians and patients about available weight management services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2296-7-35

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many providers say they omit the last 3 A's because they perceive them as time consuming and feel they lack the needed counseling skills.

    “Many providers say they omit the last 3 A’s because they perceive them as time consuming and feel they lack the needed counseling skills.52,53”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kizer KW: The new VA: a national laboratory for healthcare quality improvement. Am J Med Qual 2000, 14:3-20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forman-Hoffman, V., Little, A., & Wahls, T.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Venue
BMC Family Practice
Published
2006-06-06
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
35-35
ISSN
1471-2296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136628545
Cited by
217
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
FWCI
14.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Family Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Health Services Research and Development
  • Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
obesity treatment, primary care providers, veterans, medical education, weight management services, body mass index, clinician attitudes
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Counseling, Family Practice, Female, Hospitals, Veterans, Humans, Iowa, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Pilot Projects, Primary Health Care, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review