CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 188Access Control and TrustInformation and Cyber SecuritySecurity and Verification in Computing

Trust, Untrust, Distrust and Mistrust – An Exploration of the Dark(er) Side

Marsh, Stephen, Dibben, Mark R.·2005·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/11429760_2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/11429760_2

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Distrust is not simply the lack of trust; it is a strategy to minimize the risks that come with engagement with an untrustworthy other.

    “Distrust in this context, which I also follow in this article, is not simply the lack of trust (Cofta, 2006; Hardin, 2004; Marsh and Dibben, 2005) which would result in non-cooperation. There are many situations, in which one cannot avoid relying on an actor with unknown or questionable trustworthiness. Distrust in such cases becomes a strategy to minimize the risks that come with the engagement”

    From Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators (2021) · cites this paper as Marsh and Dibben, 2005

  • Some trust scholars have argued that mistrust is misplaced trust whereby a trustee defaults or betrays a person's trust, and mistrust does not imply the opposite of trust.

    “However, some trust scholars have argued that mistrust is misplaced trust whereby a trustee”

    From What Do We Mean When We Talk about Trust in Social Media? A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [72]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Marsh, S., & Dibben, M. R.
Affiliations
  • National Research Council Canada (CA)
  • Lincoln University (NZ)
ORCID
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published
2005
Pages
17-33
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/11429760_2
OpenAlex
W1875351242
Cited by
188
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 9
FWCI
11.63
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • NPARC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
Keywords
computational trust, distrust, concept of trust, system trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review