Cited by 91Access Control and TrustMisinformation and Its ImpactsSpam and Phishing Detection

Is distrust the negation of trust?: the value of distrust in social media

Tang, Jiliang, Hu, Xia, Liu, Huan·2014·Proceedings of the 25th ACM conference on Hypertext and social media

Abstract

Trust plays an important role in helping online users collect reliable information, and has attracted increasing attention in recent years. We learn from social sciences that, as the conceptual counterpart of trust, distrust could be as important as trust. However, little work exists in studying distrust in social media. What is the relationship between trust and distrust? Can we directly apply methodologies from social sciences to study distrust in social media? In this paper, we design two computational tasks by leveraging data mining and machine learning techniques to enable the computational understanding of distrust with social media data. The first task is to predict distrust from only trust, and the second task is to predict trust with distrust. We conduct experiments in real-world social media data. The empirical results of the first task provide concrete evidence to answer the question, "is distrust the negation of trust?" while the results of the second task help us figure out how valuable the use of distrust in trust prediction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2631775.2631793

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, J., Hu, X., & Liu, H.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 25th ACM conference on Hypertext and social media
Publisher
ACM
Published
2014-09
Pages
148-157
OpenAlex
W2024218614
Cited by
91
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
24.70
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Office of Naval Research (N000141410095)
  • Army Research Office (25071)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
Keywords
distrust, trust, social media, trust prediction, online information reliability, computational social science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review