Synergetics, Introduction to

Haken, Hermann·2009·Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science

DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_534

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_534

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Statistical physics of social dynamics
Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., & Loreto, V. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.591 · Cited by 4,119
Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review
Friston, K. J. (2011) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2011.0008 · Cited by 3,415
A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements.
Haken, H., Kelso, J. A. S., & Bunz, H. (1985) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00336922 · Cited by 2,328
Self-citation
Maximum entropy production principle in physics, chemistry and biology
Martyushev, L. M., & Seleznev, V. D. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.12.001 · Cited by 943
A Functional-Design Approach to Motivation and Self-Regulation
Kuhl, J. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50034-2 · Cited by 736
The metastable brain
Tognoli, E., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.022 · Cited by 718
The Nature of Nurture: Genetic Influence on “Environmental” Measures
Plomin, R., & Bergeman, C. S. (1991) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00070278 · Cited by 556
A DCM for resting state fMRI
Friston, K. J., Kahan, J., Biswal, B., & Razi, A. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.009 · Cited by 553
Active inference, sensory attenuation and illusions
Brown, H., Adams, R. A., Parees, I., Edwards, M., & Friston, K. (2013) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-013-0571-3 · Cited by 488
Complexity in Chemistry
Whitesides, G. M., & Ismagilov, R. F. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5411.89 · Cited by 423
Dynamics of Interpersonal Coordination
Schmidt, R. C., & Richardson, M. J. (2007) · Understanding Complex Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74479-5_14 · Cited by 415
Dopamine, affordance and active inference
Friston, K. J., Shiner, T., FitzGerald, T., Galea, J. M., Adams, R., Brown, H., Dolan, R. J., Moran, R., Stephan, K. E., & Bestmann, S. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002327 · Cited by 381
A free energy principle for biological systems
Karl, F. (2012) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e14112100 · Cited by 377
Nonverbal synchrony and affect in dyadic interactions.
Tschacher, W., Rees, G. M., & Ramseyer, F. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01323 · Cited by 351
Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change
Wilson, D. S., Hayes, S. C., Biglan, A., & Embry, D. D. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x13001593 · Cited by 255
Thermodynamic Reasons for Perception--Action Cycles
Swenson, R., & Turvey, M. T. (1991) · Ecological Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0304_2 · Cited by 193
Intentionality in non-equilibrium systems? The functional aspects of self-organized pattern formation
Tschacher, W., & Haken, H. (2007) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.09.002 · Cited by 152
Self-citation
A framework of space–time continuous models for algorithm design in swarm robotics
Hamann, H., & Wörn, H. (2008) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-008-0015-3 · Cited by 134
On markov blankets and hierarchical self-organisation
Palacios, E. R., Razi, A., Parr, T., Kirchhoff, M., & Friston, K. (2020) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.110089 · Cited by 115
Happily entangled: prediction, emotion, and the embodied mind
Miller, M., & Clark, A. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1399-7 · Cited by 114
Indirect biological measures of consciousness from field studies of brains as dynamical systems
Freeman, W. J. (2007) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2007.09.004 · Cited by 88
Dissipative Structures, Organisms and Evolution
Kondepudi, D. K., De Bari, B., & Dixon, J. A. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e22111305 · Cited by 69
Toward a simulated replica of futures: Classification and possible trajectories of simulation in futures studies
Zackery, A., Shariatpanahi, P., Zolfagharzadeh, M. M., & Pourezzat, A. A. (2016) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2015.11.002 · Cited by 29
Entropy principle of extremality as a driving force in the discrete dynamics of complex and living systems
Gontar, V. (2000) · Chaos, Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/s0960-0779(98)00287-2 · Cited by 16
Increased Firing Irregularity as an Emergent Property of Neural-State Transition in Monkey Prefrontal Cortex
Sakamoto, K., Katori, Y., Saito, N., Yoshida, S., Aihara, K., & Mushiake, H. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080906 · Cited by 13

Authors: Haken, H.
Venue: Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science
Publisher: Springer New York
Published: 2009
Pages: 8946-8948
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_534
OpenAlex: W2392040
Cited by: 2,336
References: 0
Type: reference entry
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
www.springer.com/tdm (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review