Cited by 351Action Observation and SynchronizationAttachment and Relationship DynamicsHealth, Education, and Physical Culture

Nonverbal synchrony and affect in dyadic interactions.

Open access
Tschacher, Wolfgang, Rees, Georg M., Ramseyer, Fabian·2014·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

In an experiment on dyadic social interaction, we invited participants to verbal interactions in cooperative, competitive, and 'fun task' conditions. We focused on the link between interactants' affectivity and their nonverbal synchrony, and explored which further variables contributed to affectivity: interactants' personality traits, sex, and the prescribed interaction tasks. Nonverbal synchrony was quantified by the coordination of interactants' body movement, using an automated video-analysis algorithm (motion energy analysis). Traits were assessed with standard questionnaires of personality, attachment, interactional style, psychopathology, and interpersonal reactivity. We included 168 previously unacquainted individuals who were randomly allocated to same-sex dyads (84 females, 84 males, mean age 27.8 years). Dyads discussed four topics of general interest drawn from an urn of eight topics, and finally engaged in a fun interaction. Each interaction lasted 5 min. In between interactions, participants repeatedly assessed their affect. Using hierarchical linear modeling, we found moderate to strong effect sizes for synchrony to occur, especially in competitive and fun task conditions. Positive affect was associated positively with synchrony, negative affect was associated negatively. As for causal direction, data supported the interpretation that synchrony entailed affect rather than vice versa. The link between nonverbal synchrony and affect was strongest in female dyads. The findings extend previous reports of synchrony and mimicry associated with emotion in relationships and suggest a possible mechanism of the synchrony-affect correlation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01323

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Altmann U. (2011). “Investigation of movement synchrony using windowed cross-lagged regression,” in Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication and Enactment. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6800 eds Esposito A. Vinciarelli A. Vicsi K. Pelachaud C. Nijholt A. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 335– 345 10.1007/978-3-642-25775-9-31 · DOI
  2. Bavelas J. B. Black A. Lemery C. R. Mullett J. Eisenberg N. (1987). “Motor mimicry as primitive empathy,” in Empathy and its Development ed. Strayer J. (New York: Cambridge University Press) 317– 338.
  3. Bernieri F. J. Davis J. M. Rosenthal R. Knee C. R. (1994). Interactional synchrony and rapport: measuring synchrony in displays devoid of sound and facial affect. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 20 303– 311 10.1177/0146167294203008 · DOI
  4. Bernieri F. J. Gillis J. S. Davis J. M. Grahe J. E. (1996). Dyad rapport and the accuracy of its judgment across situations: a lens model analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71 110– 129 10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.110 · DOI
  5. Bernieri F. J. Reznick S. Rosenthal R. (1988). Synchrony, pseudosynchrony, and dissynchrony: measuring the entrainment process in mother-infant interactions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54 243– 253 10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.243 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bernieri F. J. Rosenthal R. (1991). “Interpersonal coordination: behavior matching and interactional synchrony,” in Fundamentals of Nonverbal Behavior. Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction eds Feldman R. S. Rime B. (New York: Cambridge University Press), 401– 432.
  7. Blake R. Shiffrar M. (2007). Perception of human motion. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58 47– 73 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.19015 16903802 · DOI
  8. Boker S. M. Xu M. Rotondo J. L. King K. (2002). Windowed cross-correlation and peak picking for the analysis of variability in the association between behavioral time series. Psychol. Methods 7 338– 355 10.1037//1082-989X.7.3.338 12243305 · DOI
  9. Burgoon J. K. Stern L. A. Dillman L. (1995). Interpersonal Adaptation: Dyadic Interaction Patterns. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press 10.1017/CBO9780511720314 · DOI
  10. Carver C. S. (1997). Adult attachment and personality: converging evidence and a new measure. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 23 865– 883 10.1177/0146167297238007 · DOI
  11. Chartrand T. L. Bargh J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76 893– 910 10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 10402679 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Chartrand T. L. Lakin J. L. (2013). The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64 285– 308 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143754 23020640 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Chovil N. (1991). Discourse-oriented facial displays in conversation. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 25 163– 194 10.1080/08351819109389361 · DOI
  14. Condon W. S. Ogston W. D. (1966). Sound film analysis of normal and pathological behavior patterns. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 143 338– 457 10.1097/00005053-196610000-00005 5958766 · DOI
  15. Davis M. (ed.). (1982). Interaction Rhythms. Periodicity in Communicative Behavior. New York: Human Sciences Press.
  16. De Dreu C. K. Weingart L. R. Kwon S. (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: a meta-analytic review and test of two theories. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78 889– 905 10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.889 10821196 · DOI
  17. Dunbar N. E. Abra G. (2010). Observations of dyadic power in interpersonal interaction. Commu. Monogr. 77 657– 684 10.1080/03637751.2010.520018 · DOI
  18. Fuchs T. Jaegher H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 8 465– 486 10.1007/s11097-009-9136-4 · DOI
  19. Fuchs T. Koch S. C. (2014). Embodied affectivity: on moving and being moved. Front. Psychol. 5: 508 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00508 PMC4047516 24936191 · DOI
  20. Gallese V. (2005). Embodied simulation: from neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 4 23– 48 10.1007/s11097-005-4737-z · DOI · Paper page
  21. Gottman J. M. Notarius C. I. (2000). Decade review: observing marital interaction. J. Marriage Fam. 62 927– 947 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00927.x · DOI
  22. Grammer K. Filova V. Fieder M. (1997). “The communication paradox and possible solutions,” in New Aspects of Human Ethology eds Schmitt A. Atzwanger K. Grammer K. Schaefer K. (London: Plenum Press), 91– 120 10.1007/978-0-585-34289-4_6 · DOI
  23. Grammer K. Honda R. Schmitt A. Jütte A. (1999). Fuzziness of nonverbal courtship communication unblurred by motion energy detection. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77 487– 508 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.487 10510505 · DOI
  24. Graziano W. G. Jensen-Campbell L. A. Hair E. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: the case for agreeableness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70 820 10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.820 8636901 · DOI
  25. Haken H. (1977). Synergetics–An Introduction. Nonequilibrium Phase-Transitions and Self-Organization in Physics, Chemistry and Biology. Berlin: Springer.
  26. Hall N. R. Millings A. Boucas S. B. (2012). Adult attachment orientation and implicit behavioral mimicry. J. Nonverbal Behav. 36 235– 247 10.1007/s10919-012-0136-7 · DOI
  27. Hatfield E. Cacioppo J. T. Rapson R. L. (1994). Emotional Contagion. (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press).
  28. Hatfield E. Rapson R. L. Le Y. C. L. (2009). “Emotional contagion and empathy,” in The Social Neuroscience of Empathy eds Decety J. Ickes W. (Boston, MA: MIT Press), 19– 30 10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0003 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Horowitz L. M. Strauss B. Kordy H. (1994). IIP-D. Inventar zur Erfassung Interpersonaler Probleme. Deutsche Version. Weinheim: Beltz. 10593141
  30. Kenny D. A. Kashy D. A. Cook W. L. (2006). Dyadic Data Analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
  31. Kupper Z. Ramseyer F. Hoffmann H. Kalbermatten S. Tschacher W. (2010). Video-based quantification of body movement during social interaction indicates the severity of negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 121 90– 100 10.1016/j.schres.2010.03.032 20434313 · DOI
  32. Kyselo M. Tschacher W. (2014). An enactive and dynamical systems theory account of dyadic relationships. Front. Psychol. 5: 452 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00452 PMC4038949 24910623 · DOI
  33. Miles L. K. Griffiths J. L. Richardson M. J. Macrae C. N. (2010). Too late to coordinate: contextual influences on behavioral synchrony. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 40 52– 60 10.1002/ejsp.721 · DOI
  34. Nagaoka C. Komori M. (2008). Body movement synchrony in psychotherapeutic counseling: a study using the video-based quantification method. IEICE Trans. Inform. Syst. E91 1634– 1640 10.1093/ietisy/e91-d.6.1634 · DOI
  35. Nelson A. Grahe J. Ramseyer F. Serier K. (2014). Psychological data from an exploration of the rapport / synchroy interplay using motion energy analysis. J. Open Psychol. Data 2 e5. 10.5334/jopd.ae · DOI
  36. Nicolis G. Prigogine I. (1977). Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems: From Dissipative Structures to Order through Fluctuations. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
  37. Ramseyer F. (2008). Synchronisation nonverbaler Interaktion in der Psychotherapie. [Synchrony of Nonverbal Interaction in Psychotherapy]. Doctoral Dissertation, Institute of Psychology, Bern Available at: www.psync.ch
  38. Ramseyer F. Tschacher W. (2010). “Nonverbal synchrony or random coincidence? How to tell the difference,” in Development of Multimodal Interfaces: Active Listening and Synchrony eds Esposito A. Campbell N. Vogel C. Hussain A. Nijholt A. (Berlin: Springer), 182– 196.
  39. Ramseyer F. Tschacher W. (2011). Nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy: coordinated body-movement reflects relationship quality and outcome. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 79 284– 295 10.1037/a0023419 21639608 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Ramseyer F. Tschacher W. (2014). Nonverbal synchrony of head- and body-movement in psychotherapy: different signals have different associations with outcome. Front. Psychol. 5: 979 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00979 PMC4155778 25249994 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Richardson D. Dale R. Shockley K. (2008). “Synchrony and swing in conversation: coordination, temporal dynamics, and communication,” in Embodied Communication in Humans and Machines eds Wachsmuth I. Lenzen M. Knoblich G. (New York: Oxford University Pres), 75– 94.
  42. Rodriguez E. George N. Lachaux J. P. Martinerie J. Renault B. Varela F. J. (1999). Perception’s shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity. Nature 397 430– 433 10.1038/17120 9989408 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Salvatore S. Tschacher W. (2012). Time dependency of psychotherapeutic exchanges: the contribution of the theory of dynamic systems in analyzing process. Front. Psychol. 3: 253 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00253 PMC3404413 22848205 · DOI
  44. Scheflen A. E. (1964). The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry 27 316– 331. 14216879
  45. Schmidt R. C. Morr S. Fitzpatrick P. Richardson M. J. (2012). Measuring the dynamics of interactional synchrony. J. Nonverbal Behav. 36 263– 279 10.1007/s10919-012-0138-5 · DOI
  46. Seiter J. S. Weger H. Kinzer H. J. Jensen A. S. (2009). Impression management in televised debates: the effect of background nonverbal behavior on audience perceptions of debaters’ likeability. Commu. Res. Rep. 26 1– 11 10.1080/08824090802636959 · DOI
  47. Stel M. Vonk R. (2010). Mimicry in social interaction: benefits for mimickers, mimickees, and their interaction. Br. J. Psychol. 101 311– 323 10.1348/000712609X46542 19646328 · DOI
  48. Thompson L. (1990). Negotiation behavior and outcomes: empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychol. Bull. 108 515– 532 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.515 · DOI
  49. Tschacher W. Haken H. (2007). Intentionality in non-equilibrium systems? The functional aspects of self-organized pattern formation. New Ideas Psychol. 25 1– 15 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Vallacher R. R. Nowak A. (2009). “The dynamics of human experience: fundamentals of dynamical social psychology,” in Chaos and Complexity in Psychology: The Theory of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems, eds Guastello S. J. Koopmans M. Pincus D. (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press), 370– 401.
  51. Wallbott H. G. (1996). “Congruence, contagion, and motor mimicry: mutualities in nonverbal exchange,” in Mutualities in Dialogue, eds Markova I. Grauman C. F. Foppa K. (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press), 82– 98.
  52. Wiltermuth S. S. Heath C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychol. Sci. 20 1– 5 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02253.x 19152536 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Yong E. (2012). Replication studies: bad copy. Nature 485 298– 300 10.1038/485298a 22596136 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tschacher, W., Rees, G. M., & Ramseyer, F.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Tschacher, Wolfgang
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2014-11-24
Volume
5
Pages
1323-1323
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2168822232
Cited by
351
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
18.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Funders
  • European Cooperation in Science and Technology
  • Department of Home Affairs
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Health, Education, and Physical Culture
Keywords
nonverbal synchrony, affect, dyadic interaction, motor coordination, positive affect, negative affect, competitive interactions, collaborative interaction, sex differences, personality traits, interpersonal reactivity, attachment, psychopathology, interaction styles, mimicry, causal direction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review