The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating Diffusion of Innovations and Theory of Reasoned Action models to predict utilization of information technology by end-users
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Self-citationUnderstanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Mathieson, K. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.173 · Cited by 4,216
Cited by
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis
Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96 · Cited by 1,611
Senior citizens’ acceptance of information systems: A study in the context of e-government services
Phang, C. W., Sutanto, J., Kankanhalli, A., Li, Y., Tan, B. C. Y., & Teo, H.-H. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2006.883710 · Cited by 331
Technology Adaptation in E-commerce:
Chen, L.-D., & Tan, J. (2004) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2003.11.014 · Cited by 306
Chauhan, S., & Jaiswal, M. (2016) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2016.05.005 · Cited by 180
Situational variables in online versus offline channel choice
Chocarro, R., Cortiñas, M., & Villanueva, M.-L. (2013) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2013.03.004 · Cited by 139
Supply chain innovation diffusion: Going beyond adoption
Hazen, B. T., Overstreet, R. E., & Cegielski, C. G. (2012) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574091211226957 · Cited by 117
(2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 76
An Examination of Factors Associated with User Acceptance of Social Shopping Websites
Shen, J., & Eder, L. B. (2011) · International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction · doi:10.4018/jthi.2011010102 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I.
- Venue
- Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1996
- Pages
- 132-146
- OpenAlex
- W168200403
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 11.45
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
