Cited by 333Technology Adoption and User BehaviourConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty

Technology Adaptation in E-commerce:

Chen, Lei-Da, Tan, Justin·2004·European Management Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.emj.2003.11.014

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, L.-D., & Tan, J.
Affiliations
Creighton University (US)
Venue
European Management Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-02
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
74-86
ISSN
0263-2373 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3124698642
Cited by
306
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 25
FWCI
18.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Keywords
e-commerce, virtual stores, technology acceptance, diffusion of innovations, e-commerce strategy, perceived trust, perceived service quality, information richness, product offerings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review