Cited by 180Technology Adoption and User BehaviourERP Systems Implementation and ImpactInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development

Determinants of acceptance of ERP software training in business schools: Empirical investigation using UTAUT model

Chauhan, Sumedha, Jaiswal, Mahadeo·2016·The International Journal of Management Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijme.2016.05.005

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chauhan, S., & Jaiswal, M.
Affiliations
  • GD Goenka University (IN)
  • Management Development Institute (IN)
Corresponding author
Chauhan, Sumedha
Venue
The International Journal of Management Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
248-262
ISSN
1472-8117 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2410057778
Cited by
180
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2017: 5
FWCI
12.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The International Journal of Management Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
technology acceptance, UTAUT, business students, gender differences, student experience, behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, employability, business schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review