Cited by 17Computational Drug Discovery MethodsSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Fighting COVID-19 with Artificial Intelligence

Monteleone, Stefania, Kellici, Tahsin F., Southey, Michelle, Bodkin, Michael J., Heifetz, Alexander·2022·Methods in molecular biology

Abstract

The development of vaccines for the treatment of COVID-19 is paving the way for new hope. Despite this, the risk of the virus mutating into a vaccine-resistant variant still persists. As a result, the demand of efficacious drugs to treat COVID-19 is still pertinent. To this end, scientists continue to identify and repurpose marketed drugs for this new disease. Many of these drugs are currently undergoing clinical trials and, so far, only one has been officially approved by FDA. Drug repurposing is a much faster route to the clinic than standard drug development of novel molecules, nevertheless in a pandemic this process is still not fast enough to halt the spread of the virus. Artificial intelligence has already played a large part in hastening the drug discovery process, not only by facilitating the selection of potential drug candidates but also in monitoring the pandemic and enabling faster diagnosis of patients. In this chapter, we focus on the impact and challenges that artificial intelligence has demonstrated thus far with respect to drug repurposing of therapeutics for the treatment of COVID-19.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-0716-1787-8_3

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML algorithms have been used to analyze large datasets of potential compounds and identify those with the most potential for treating COVID-19.

    “ML algorithms have been used to analyze large datasets of potential compounds and identify those with the most potential for treating the virus.”
  • In some cases, AI-powered approaches have identified promising drug candidates for COVID-19 in a fraction of the time that traditional methods would take.

    “In some cases, these AI-powered approaches have been able to identify promising drug candidates in a fraction of the time that it would take when using traditional methods [26,27,28,29,30,31].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monteleone, S., Kellici, T. F., Southey, M., Bodkin, M. J., & Heifetz, A.
Affiliations
Evotec (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Monteleone, Stefania
Venue
Methods in molecular biology
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2021-11-04
Volume
2390
Pages
103-112
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W3209243574
Cited by
17
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4
FWCI
9.34
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, drug repurposing, artificial intelligence, drug discovery, antiviral agents, clinical trials, SARS-CoV-2
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Drug Treatment, Animals, Antiviral Agents, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Structure-Activity Relationship, Molecular Structure, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Drug Discovery, Drug Repositioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review