Cited by 10Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

pSHDY: A New Tool for Genetic Engineering of Cyanobacteria

Behle, Anna, Axmann, Ilka M.·2022·Methods in Molecular Biology

Abstract

Genetic engineering of cyanobacteria is currently limited to genomic integration via homologous recombination and RSF1010-based conjugative vector systems. Here, we introduce a rationally designed conjugative vector with two BioBrick-based cloning sites which enables facilitated and modular cloning. This streamlined vector is suitable for a variety of synthetic biology applications, such as expression of multiple enzymes from metabolic pathways for the production of biofuels or secondary metabolites, or screening of modular parts such as promoters, further facilitating applications to improve crop plants using synthetic biology. Finally, we present a general approach to cloning of constructs, as well as detailed protocols for conjugation and culturing of strains carrying said constructs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-0716-1791-5_4

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shuttle plasmids can replicate in multiple host organisms, usually Escherichia coli and the target cyanobacterial strain, which simplifies plasmid construction and amplification in E. coli prior to transfer into cyanobacteria.

    “Shuttle plasmids can replicate in multiple host organisms, usually Escherichia coli and the target cyanobacterial strain, which simplifies plasmid construction and amplification in E. coli prior to transfer into cyanobacteria [88,90].”
  • The selection between plasmid-based expression and chromosomal integration depends on several factors, including the required stability of gene expression, the size of the introduced construct, and the specific physiological and genetic characteristics of the cyanobacterial strain.

    “The selection between these methods depends on several factors, including the required stability of gene expression, the size of the introduced construct, and the specific physiological and genetic characteristics of the cyanobacterial strain [88].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Behle, A., & Axmann, I. M.
Affiliations
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Axmann, Ilka M.
Venue
Methods in Molecular Biology
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2022
Volume
2379
Pages
67-79
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W4213273407
Cited by
10
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.10
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
cyanobacteria, genetic engineering, homologous recombination, RSF1010, synthetic biology, biofuel production, secondary metabolite production, promoter screening, crop improvement, conjugation
MeSH terms
Cyanobacteria, Genetic Engineering, Genetic Vectors, Plasmids, Synthetic Biology, Metabolic Engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review