Cited by 162Student Assessment and FeedbackEvaluation of Teaching PracticesHigher Education Teaching and Evaluation

Transforming holistic assessment and grading into a vehicle for complex learning

Sadler, D. Royce·2009·Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4020-8905-3_4

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sadler, D. R.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Sadler, D. Royce
Venue
Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education
Published
2008-11-13
Pages
1-19
OpenAlex
W1855835750
Cited by
162
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
14.84
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
Keywords
holistic assessment, grading, complex learning, higher education assessment, learning assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review