The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Jingle, Jangle, and Conceptual Haziness: Evolution and Future Directions of the Engagement Construct
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Compared to other well-established and extensively researched constructs like motivation, engagement is regarded as a fledging concept (Hiver et al., 2021) as Reschly and Christenson (2012) also call it “a new kid on the block” (p. 4).”
From Researching and Practicing Positive Psychology in Second/Foreign Language Learning and Teaching: The Past, Current Status and Future Directions (2021) · cites this paper as Reschly and Christenson, 2012
In the citing paper
“Engagement is a construct closely related to motivation.”
From Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom (2016) · cites this paper as Reschly & Christenson, 2012
Citations
Cites
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581
Positive psychology: An introduction.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.5 · Cited by 11,351
-Handbook of Self-Determination Research by Edward L. Deci and Richard M. Ryan (Editors)
Paulson, D. S. (2002) · The Journal of mind and behavior · Cited by 5,171
Handbook of Self-Determination Research
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004) · Cited by 4,528
Handbook of Research on Student Engagement
(2012) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7 · Cited by 3,050
Self-citation(2002) · Cited by 3,047
Finn, J. D. (1989) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170412 · Cited by 2,702
Hart, A. W. (1999) · Educational Management & Administration · doi:10.1177/0263211x990273008 · Cited by 2,376
Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic?
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012840 · Cited by 2,037
Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.20303 · Cited by 1,956
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Appleton, J. J., Reschly, A. L., & Martin, C. (2012). Research to practice: Measuring and reporting student engagement. Manuscript under review.
- Jordan, W. J., McPartland, J. M., & Lara, J. (1999). Rethinking the causes of high school dropout. The Prevention Researcher, 6, 1–4.
- Reschly, A. L., Betts, J., & Appleton, J. J. (2012). Student Engagement Instrument: Evidence of convergent and divergent validity across measures of engagement and motivation. Manuscript under review.
- Rumberger, R. W., & Lim, S. A. (2008). Why students drop out of school: A review of 25 years of research (California Dropout Research Project Report #15). University of California Santa Barbara.
- Sinclair, M. F., & Kaibel, C. (2002). 2002 Dakota county: Secondary Check & Connect program. Program evaluation 2002 final summary report. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8 · Cited by 1,097
“…is that motivation is an antecedent to engagement; it is the intent and unobservable force that energises behaviour (Lim, 2004; Reeve, 2012; Reschly & Christenson, 2012), whereas student engagement is energy and effort in action; an observable manifestation (Appleton et al., 2008; Eccles &…”
BackgroundMeasuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review
Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005 · Cited by 1,010
The Challenges of Defining and Measuring Student Engagement in Science
Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924 · Cited by 1,044
Wang, Y., Derakhshan, A., & Zhang, L. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731721 · Cited by 762
“Cognitive engagement happens when one is adequately, mentally challenged, and absorbed in one’s work (Reschly and Christenson, 2012).”
BackgroundExploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000094 · Cited by 752
Metadata
- Authors
- Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reschly, Amy L.
- ORCID
- Reschly, Amy L.
- Venue
- Handbook of Research on Student Engagement
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 2012
- Pages
- 3-19
- OpenAlex
- W128053457
- Cited by
- 980
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 118.13
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Youth Development and Social Support
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- student engagement, conceptual history, disciplinary differences, youth outcomes, engagement theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
