Cited by 453Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPsychology Research and BibliometricsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Advances in Meta-Analysis

Pigott, Terri D.·2012·Springer eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4614-2278-5

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pigott, T. D.
Affiliations
Loyola University Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Pigott, Terri D.
Venue
Springer eBooks
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2012
OpenAlex
W1574663401
Cited by
453
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.57
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
meta-analysis, evidence synthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review