CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Exploring Chromatin Readers Using High-Accuracy Quantitative Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics

Smits, Arne H., Vermeulen, Michiel·2014·Systems Analysis of Chromatin-Related Protein Complexes in Cancer
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7931-4_7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4614-7931-4_7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 2

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell. 2007;128(4):693–705. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Taverna SD, Li H, Ruthenburg AJ, Allis CD, Patel DJ. How chromatin-binding modules interpret histone modifications: lessons from professional pocket pickers. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007;14(11):1025–40. · DOI
  3. Weake VM, Workman JL. Histone ubiquitination: triggering gene activity. Mol Cell. 2008;29(6):653–63. · DOI
  4. Xiao A, Li H, Shechter D, Ahn SH, Fabrizio LA, Erdjument-Bromage H, et al. WSTF regulates the H2A.X DNA damage response via a novel tyrosine kinase activity. Nature. 2009;457(7225):57–62. · DOI
  5. Bannister AJ, Zegerman P, Partridge JF, Miska EA, Thomas JO, Allshire RC, et al. Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain. Nature. 2001;410(6824):120–4. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Lachner M, O’Carroll D, Rea S, Mechtler K, Jenuwein T. Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins. Nature. 2001;410(6824):116–20. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Li H, Ilin S, Wang W, Duncan EM, Wysocka J, Allis CD, et al. Molecular basis for site-specific read-out of histone H3K4me3 by the BPTF PHD finger of NURF. Nature. 2006;442(7098):91–5. · DOI
  8. Kim J, Daniel J, Espejo A, Lake A, Krishna M, Xia L, et al. Tudor, MBT and chromo domains gauge the degree of lysine methylation. EMBO Rep. 2006;7(4):397–403. · DOI
  9. Wysocka J. Identifying novel proteins recognizing histone modifications using peptide pull-down assay. Methods. 2006;40(4):339–43. · DOI
  10. Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Kristensen DB, Steen H, Pandey A, et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2002;1(5):376–86. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Eberl HC, Mann M, Vermeulen M. Quantitative proteomics for epigenetics. Chembiochem. 2011;12(2):224–34. · DOI
  12. Schulze WX, Mann M. A novel proteomic screen for peptide-protein interactions. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(11):10756–64. · DOI
  13. Vermeulen M, Mulder KW, Denissov S, Pijnappel WW, van Schaik FM, Varier RA, et al. Selective anchoring of TFIID to nucleosomes by trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4. Cell. 2007;131(1):58–69. · DOI
  14. Dhalluin C, Carlson JE, Zeng L, He C, Aggarwal AK, Zhou MM. Structure and ligand of a histone acetyltransferase bromodomain. Nature. 1999;399(6735):491–6. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Vermeulen M, Eberl HC, Matarese F, Marks H, Denissov S, Butter F, et al. Quantitative interaction proteomics and genome-wide profiling of epigenetic histone marks and their readers. Cell. 2010;142(6):967–80. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Mittler G, Butter F, Mann M. A SILAC-based DNA protein interaction screen that identifies candidate binding proteins to functional DNA elements. Genome Res. 2009;19(2):284–93. · DOI
  17. Butter F, Davison L, Viturawong T, Scheibe M, Vermeulen M, Todd JA, et al. Proteome-wide analysis of disease-associated SNPs that show allele-specific transcription factor binding. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(9):e1002982. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Butter F, Kappei D, Buchholz F, Vermeulen M, Mann M. A domesticated transposon mediates the effects of a single-nucleotide polymorphism responsible for enhanced muscle growth. EMBO Rep. 2010;11(4):305–11. · DOI
  19. Spruijt CG, Bartels SJ, Brinkman AB, Tjeertes JV, Poser I, Stunnenberg HG, et al. CDK2AP1/DOC-1 is a bona fide subunit of the Mi-2/NuRD complex. Mol Biosyst. 2010;6(9):1700–6. · DOI
  20. Bartels SJ, Spruijt CG, Brinkman AB, Jansen PW, Vermeulen M, Stunnenberg HG. A SILAC-based screen for Methyl-CpG binding proteins identifies RBP-J as a DNA methylation and sequence-specific binding protein. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25884. · DOI
  21. Bartke T, Vermeulen M, Xhemalce B, Robson SC, Mann M, Kouzarides T. Nucleosome-interacting proteins regulated by DNA and histone methylation. Cell. 2010;143(3):470–84. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Nikolov M, Stutzer A, Mosch K, Krasauskas A, Soeroes S, Stark H, et al. Chromatin affinity purification and quantitative mass spectrometry defining the interactome of histone modification patterns. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;10(11):M110.005371. · DOI
  23. Margueron R, Reinberg D. The Polycomb complex PRC2 and its mark in life. Nature. 2011;469(7330):343–9. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Lai AY, Wade PA. Cancer biology and NuRD: a multifaceted chromatin remodelling complex. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(8):588–96. · DOI
  25. Schuettengruber B, Martinez AM, Iovino N, Cavalli G. Trithorax group proteins: switching genes on and keeping them active. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12(12):799–814. · DOI
  26. Shilatifard A. The COMPASS family of histone H3K4 methylases: mechanisms of regulation in development and disease pathogenesis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:65–95. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Krogan NJ, Cagney G, Yu H, Zhong G, Guo X, Ignatchenko A, et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 2006;440(7084):637–43. · DOI
  28. Gavin AC, Aloy P, Grandi P, Krause R, Boesche M, Marzioch M, et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature. 2006;440(7084):631–6. · DOI
  29. Vermeulen M, Hubner NC, Mann M. High confidence determination of specific protein–protein interactions using quantitative mass spectrometry. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008;19(4):331–7. · DOI
  30. Ong SE, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat Chem Biol. 2005;1(5):252–62. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Hubner NC, Bird AW, Cox J, Splettstoesser B, Bandilla P, Poser I, et al. Quantitative proteomics combined with BAC TransgeneOmics reveals in vivo protein interactions. J Cell Biol. 2010;189(4):739–54. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Rinner O, Mueller LN, Hubalek M, Muller M, Gstaiger M, Aebersold R. An integrated mass spectrometric and computational framework for the analysis of protein interaction networks. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(3):345–52. · DOI
  33. Sowa ME, Bennett EJ, Gygi SP, Harper JW. Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape. Cell. 2009;138(2):389–403. · DOI
  34. Sardiu ME, Cai Y, Jin J, Swanson SK, Conaway RC, Conaway JW, et al. Probabilistic assembly of human protein interaction networks from label-free quantitative proteomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(5):1454–9. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Choi H, Larsen B, Lin ZY, Breitkreutz A, Mellacheruvu D, Fermin D, et al. SAINT: probabilistic scoring of affinity purification-mass spectrometry data. Nat Methods. 2011;8(1):70–3. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Selbach M, Mann M. Protein interaction screening by quantitative immunoprecipitation combined with knockdown (QUICK). Nat Methods. 2006;3(12):981–3. · DOI
  37. Malovannaya A, Lanz RB, Jung SY, Bulynko Y, Le NT, Chan DW, et al. Analysis of the human endogenous coregulator complexome. Cell. 2011;145(5):787–99. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Mak AB, Ni Z, Hewel JA, Chen GI, Zhong G, Karamboulas K, et al. A lentiviral functional proteomics approach identifies chromatin remodeling complexes important for the induction of pluripotency. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010;9(5):811–23. · DOI
  39. Poser I, Sarov M, Hutchins JR, Heriche JK, Toyoda Y, Pozniakovsky A, et al. BAC TransgeneOmics: a high-throughput method for exploration of protein function in mammals. Nat Methods. 2008;5(5):409–15. · DOI
  40. Glatter T, Wepf A, Aebersold R, Gstaiger M. An integrated workflow for charting the human interaction proteome: insights into the PP2A system. Mol Syst Biol. 2009;5:237. · DOI
  41. Rothbauer U, Zolghadr K, Muyldermans S, Schepers A, Cardoso MC, Leonhardt H. A versatile nanotrap for biochemical and functional studies with fluorescent fusion proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008;7(2):282–9. · DOI
  42. Shen Z, Sathyan KM, Geng Y, Zheng R, Chakraborty A, Freeman B, et al. A WD-repeat protein stabilizes ORC binding to chromatin. Mol Cell. 2010;40(1):99–111. · DOI
  43. van Nuland R, Smits AH, Pallaki P, Jansen PW, Vermeulen M, Timmers HT. Quantitative dissection and stoichiometry determination of the human SET1/MLL histone methyltransferase complexes. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33(10):2067–77. · DOI
  44. Hubner NC, Mann M. Extracting gene function from protein–protein interactions using Quantitative BAC InteraCtomics (QUBIC). Methods. 2011;53(4):453–9. · DOI
  45. Cox J, Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(12):1367–72. · DOI · Paper page
  46. Eberl HC, Spruijt CG, Kelstrup CD, Vermeulen M, Mann M. A map of general and specialized chromatin readers in mouse tissues generated by label-free interaction proteomics. Mol Cell. 2013;49(2):368–78. · DOI · Paper page
  47. Bennett EJ, Rush J, Gygi SP, Harper JW. Dynamics of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase network revealed by systematic quantitative proteomics. Cell. 2010;143(6):951–65. · DOI
  48. Schmidt C, Lenz C, Grote M, Luhrmann R, Urlaub H. Determination of protein stoichiometry within protein complexes using absolute quantification and multiple reaction monitoring. Anal Chem. 2010;82(7):2784–96. · DOI
  49. Wepf A, Glatter T, Schmidt A, Aebersold R, Gstaiger M. Quantitative interaction proteomics using mass spectrometry. Nat Methods. 2009;6(3):203–5. · DOI
  50. Ciferri C, Lander GC, Maiolica A, Herzog F, Aebersold R, Nogales E. Molecular architecture of human polycomb repressive complex 2. Elife. 2012;1:e00005. · DOI
  51. Xie W, Ling T, Zhou Y, Feng W, Zhu Q, Stunnenberg HG, et al. The chromatin remodeling complex NuRD establishes the poised state of rRNA genes characterized by bivalent histone modifications and altered nucleosome positions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(21):8161–6. · DOI · Paper page
  52. Sharma K, Weber C, Bairlein M, Greff Z, Keri G, Cox J, et al. Proteomics strategy for quantitative protein interaction profiling in cell extracts. Nat Methods. 2009;6(10):741–4. · DOI
  53. Byrum SD, Raman A, Taverna SD, Tackett AJ. ChAP-MS: a method for identification of proteins and histone posttranslational modifications at a single genomic locus. Cell Rep. 2012;2(1):198–205. · DOI
  54. Fujita T, Fujii H. Direct identification of insulator components by insertional chromatin immunoprecipitation. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26109. · DOI
  55. Lambert JP, Mitchell L, Rudner A, Baetz K, Figeys D. A novel proteomics approach for the discovery of chromatin-associated protein networks. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009;8(4):870–82. · DOI
  56. Dejardin J, Kingston RE. Purification of proteins associated with specific genomic loci. Cell. 2009;136(1):175–86. · DOI
  57. Nicodeme E, Jeffrey KL, Schaefer U, Beinke S, Dewell S, Chung CW, et al. Suppression of inflammation by a synthetic histone mimic. Nature. 2010;468(7327):1119–23. · DOI · Paper page
  58. Filippakopoulos P, Qi J, Picaud S, Shen Y, Smith WB, Fedorov O, et al. Selective inhibition of BET bromodomains. Nature. 2010;468(7327):1067–73. · DOI · Paper page
  59. Dawson MA, Kouzarides T. Cancer epigenetics: from mechanism to therapy. Cell. 2012;150(1):12–27. · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Smits, A. H., & Vermeulen, M.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Corresponding author
Vermeulen, Michiel
ORCID
Venue
Systems Analysis of Chromatin-Related Protein Complexes in Cancer
Publisher
Springer New York
Published
2013-07-17
Pages
133-148
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4614-7931-4_7
OpenAlex
W50501680
Cited by
2
References
64
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.97
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
chromatin reader, quantitative mass spectrometry, chromatin structure, protein complexes, chromatin biology, protein complex formation, eukaryotic cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review