Cited by 239Personality Traits and PsychologyCultural Differences and ValuesPsychological Testing and Assessment

The Cross-Cultural Generalizability of the Five-Factor Model of Personality

Rolland, Jean-Pierre·2002·The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_2

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Big Five model of personality has well-established cross-cultural generalizability.

    “Similarly, while the Big Five model of personality has well-established cross-cultural generalizability49, some non-Western cultures express additional personality dimensions that do not exist in top-down, nomothetic personality taxonomies such as the Big Five50.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rolland, J.-P.
Affiliations
Université Paris Nanterre (FR)
Corresponding author
Rolland, Jean-Pierre
Venue
The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2002
Pages
7-28
OpenAlex
W186538591
Cited by
239
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
17.83
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, cross-cultural generalizability, NEO-PI-R, factor structure, cultural differences in personality, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism, conscientiousness, openness to experience, individual differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review