Cited by 130Wittgensteinian philosophy and applicationsPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceChild and Animal Learning Development

Rule-Following

Hayes, Steven C., Zettle, Robert D., Rosenfarb, Irwin·1989·Rule-Governed Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4757-0447-1_6

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayes, S. C., Zettle, R. D., & Rosenfarb, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Reno (US)
  • Wichita State University (US)
  • Auburn University (US)
Venue
Rule-Governed Behavior
Publisher
Springer US
Published
1989
Pages
191-220
OpenAlex
W4243661338
Cited by
128
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
90.19
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
rule-following, rule interpretation, verbal stimulation, cognitive processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review