Cited by 2,656Social and Intergroup PsychologyPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentSocial Power and Status Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Belief in a Just World

Lerner, Melvin J.·1980·Springer eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4899-0448-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,001–1,011 of 1,011

Metadata

Authors
Lerner, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Lerner, Melvin J.
Venue
Springer eBooks
Publisher
Springer US
Published
1980
OpenAlex
W4234878346
Cited by
2,656
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 92 · 2025: 121 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 124 · 2021: 141 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 106 · 2015: 111 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 92 · 2012: 85
FWCI
18.59
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
belief in a just world, meaning-making, coping with adversity, sense of justice, psychological adjustment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review