Cited by 21Social and Intergroup PsychologyPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionCultural Differences and Values

Personal Versus General Belief in a Just World, Karma, and Well-Being: Evidence from Thailand and the UK

Open access
Chobthamkit, Phatthanakit, Sutton, Robbie M., Uskul, Ayse K., Chaleeraktrakoon, Trawin·2022·Social Justice Research

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11211-022-00393-4

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individual differences in belief in karma and belief in a just world are only moderately correlated.

    “Beliefs about karma may partly reflect intuitions about fairness that arise from general belief in a just world (Baumard & Chevallier, 2012), but individual differences in belief in karma and belief in a just world are only moderately correlated (Chobthamkit et al., 2022;White, Norenzayan, et al., 2019), and explicit belief in karma is also shaped by particular religious cultures and cognitive”

    From Victim blaming and belief in karma (2024) · cites this paper as Chobthamkit et al., 2022

  • The pattern of just-world motivation has been primarily documented in Western cultures, with some cross-cultural samples.

    “This pattern of just-world motivation has been primarily documented in Western cultures, with some cross-cultural samples (e.g.Chobthamkit et al., 2022;Furnham, 1993;Grimes et al., 2015;Kaplan, 2012), as part of general motivational systems in secular participants.”

    From Victim blaming and belief in karma (2024) · cites this paper as Chobthamkit et al., 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bronkhorst, J. (2011). Karma. University of Hawai'i Press.
  2. Park, N., & Huebner, S. (2005). A cross-cultural study of the levels and correlates of life satisfaction among adolescents. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 444-456.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chobthamkit, P., Sutton, R. M., Uskul, A. K., & Chaleeraktrakoon, T.
Affiliations
  • Thammasat University (TH)
  • University of Kent (GB)
Corresponding author
Chobthamkit, Phatthanakit
Venue
Social Justice Research
Published
2022-06-12
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
296-317
ISSN
  • 0885-7466 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6725
OpenAlex
W4281725955
Cited by
21
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Justice Research (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Thammasat University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
belief in a just world, personal belief in a just world, karma, well-being, life satisfaction, depression, cultural differences, cross-cultural comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review