Cited by 52Attachment and Relationship DynamicsResilience and Mental HealthHealth disparities and outcomes

Social Support, Coping, and Psychological Adjustment

Holahan, Charles J., Moos, Rudolf H., Bonin, Liza·1997·Sourcebook of Social Support and Personality

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4899-1843-7_8

Cites

138 of 138 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holahan, C. J., Moos, R. H., & Bonin, L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Venue
Sourcebook of Social Support and Personality
Publisher
Springer US
Published
1997
Pages
169-186
OpenAlex
W189838059
Cited by
52
References
138
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.91
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
social support, coping, psychological adjustment, social resources, interpersonal relationships, coping resources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review