Cited by 532Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Emotion-regulation skills as a treatment target in psychotherapy

Berking, Matthias, Wupperman, Peggilee, Reichardt, Alexander, Pejic, Tanja, Dippel, Alexandra, Znoj, Hansjörg·2008·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Background Deficits in emotion-regulation skills have been shown to be integral to the development and maintenance of a wide range of mental disorders.Aim To evaluate the importance of these skills as a treatment target in psychotherapeutic interventions.Method Nine specific emotion-regulation skills were assessed in a sample of 289 inpatients before and after cognitive-behavioural treatment. Self-reports of success in pretreatment skills application were first compared to those of 246 non-clinical controls. Pretreatment skills application and change in skills application during therapy were then related to a variety of outcome measures. Finally, the effects of integrating a brief training of general emotion-regulation skills into the CBT-based treatment were evaluated in a controlled trial.Results Uni- and multivariate analyses identified the skills of acceptance, tolerance, and active modification of negative emotions as particularly important for current mental health and treatment outcome. Replacing parts of the standard CBT treatment with the emotion-regulation training enhanced the effects of the CBT treatment on skills application and on other measures of mental health.Conclusion Incorporating interventions that directly target general emotion-regulation skills may improve the effectiveness of psychotherapeutic interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2008.08.005

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berking, M., Wupperman, P., Reichardt, A., Pejic, T., Dippel, A., & Znoj, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Corresponding author
Berking, Matthias
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
46
Issue
11
Pages
1230-1237
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118514915
Cited by
532
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 20
FWCI
16.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
emotion regulation skills, emotion regulation training, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment goals, acceptance, mental illness, treatment outcomes, hospitalized patients
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review