Cited by 328Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsTreatment of Major Depression

Emotion Regulation Skills Training Enhances the Efficacy of Inpatient Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Berking, Matthias, Ebert, David, Cuijpers, Pim, Hofmann, Stefan G.·2013·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

Background: Deficits in emotion regulation skills are possible factors maintaining major depressive disorder (MDD). Therefore, the aim of the study was to test whether integrating a systematic emotion regulation training (ERT) enhances the efficacy of routine inpatient cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for MDD. Methods: In a prospective randomized controlled trial, 432 inpatients meeting criteria for MDD were assigned to receive either routine CBT or CBT enriched with an intense emotion regulation skills training (CBT-ERT). Results: Participants in the CBT-ERT condition demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in depression (response rates - CBT: 75.5%, CBT-ERT: 84.9%; remission rates - CBT: 51.1%, CBT-ERT: 65.1%). Moreover, CBT-ERT participants demonstrated a significantly greater reduction of negative affect, as well as a greater increase of well-being and emotion regulation skills particularly relevant for mental health. Conclusions: Integrating strategies that target emotion regulation skills improves the efficacy of CBT for MDD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000348448

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adding mindfulness instruction to standard CBT results in greater effects on depression and anxiety symptoms compared to CBT alone.

    “Third, preliminary evidence from face-to-face CBT studies suggests that adding mindfulness instruction to standard CBT results in greater effects on depression and anxiety symptoms compared to CBT alone.”

    From Online mindfulness-enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression: Outcomes of a pilot trial (2018) · cites this paper as Berking et al., 2013

    The Treatments section describes an emotion-regulation training program that draws partly on mindfulness-based interventions, not an isolated addition of mindfulness instruction. The Results section reports a greater reduction in depressive symptoms with CBT-ERT than with CBT alone, but does not report a comparative effect on anxiety symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Standard CBT was inferior to CBT containing additional mindfulness instruction, which demonstrated greater reductions in depression and improvements in emotion regulation.

    “For example, Berking et al. (2013) found that standard CBT was inferior to CBT containing additional mindfulness instruction, which demonstrated greater reductions in depression and improvements in emotion regulation.”

    From Online mindfulness-enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression: Outcomes of a pilot trial (2018) · cites this paper as Berking et al., 2013

    The Results and Discussion report greater reductions in depression and stronger emotion-regulation skills with CBT plus emotion regulation skills training (ERT) than with routine CBT. The Treatments section says ERT drew partly on mindfulness-based interventions, but it was a broader, multicomponent training, not simply additional mindfulness instruction. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A study adding emotion regulation skills training to CBT for depression found a superior effect of CBT with emotion regulation skills training compared to CBT without this training.

    “The only exception was a study in which emotion regulation skills training was added to CBT for treating depression (Berking et al. 2013), and this study found a superior effect of CBT with emotion regulation skills training compared to CBT without this training.”

    From The Role of Common Factors in Psychotherapy Outcomes (2019) · cites this paper as Berking et al. 2013

  • Context is increasingly important for determining effectiveness and mental health outcomes.

    “a factor found to be increasingly important to determine effectiveness and mental health outcomes,40,41”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Härter M, Sitta P, Keller F, Metzger R, Wiegand W, Schell G: Stationäre psychiatrisch-psycho- therapeutische Depressionsbehandlung: Proz- ess-und Ergebnisqualität anhand eines Mod- ellprojekts in Baden-Württemberg. Nervenar- zt 2004; 11: 1083-1091.
  2. Berking M: Training Emotionaler Kompeten- zen. Heidelberg, Springer, 2010 (English trans- lation: The Affect Regulation Training. New York, Springer, in press).
  3. Rude S, McCarthy C: Emotional functioning in depressed and depression-vulnerable col- lege students. Cogn Emot 2003; 17: 799-806.
  4. Berking M, Wupperman P: Emotion regula- tion and health: state of the art. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2012; 25: 128-134.
  5. Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S: When are adap- tive strategies most predictive of psychopa- thology? J Abnorm Psychol 2012; 121: 276-281.
  6. Greenberg LS, Watson JC: Experiential ther- apy for depression: differential effects of cli- ent-centered relationship conditions and pro- cess experiential interventions. Psychother Res 1998; 8: 210-224.
  7. Goldman RN, Greenberg LS, Angus L: The ef- fects of adding specific emotion-focused in- terventions to the therapeutic relationship in the treatment of depression. Psychother Res 2006; 16: 536-546.
  8. Berking M, Wupperman P, Reichardt A, Pejic T, Dippel A, Znoj H: General emotion-regu- lation skills as a treatment target in psycho- therapy. Behav Res Ther 2008; 46: 1230-1237.
  9. Berking M, Schwarz J: The affect regulation training; in Gross JJ (ed): Handbook of Emo- tion Regulation . New York, Guilford, in press.
  10. Berking M, Meier C, Wupperman P: Enhanc- ing emotion-regulation skills in police offi- cers -results of a controlled study. Behav Ther 2010; 41: 329-339.
  11. Herrmann C, Buss U: Vorstellung und Vali- dierung einer deutschen Version der Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD-Skala). Diagnostica 1994; 40: 143-154.
  12. Berking M, Margraf M, Ebert D, Wupper- mann P, Hofmann S, Junghanns K: Emotion regulation skills as a predictor of relapse dur- ing and after treatment of alcohol depen- dence. J Consult Clin Psychol 2011; 79: 307- 318.
  13. Berking M, Poppe C, Wuppermann P, Luh- mann M, Ebert D, Seifritz E: Emotion-regula- tion skills and psychopathology: is the ability to modify one's negative emotions the ulti- mate pathway by which all other skills affect symptoms of mental disorders? J Behav Ther Exp 2012; 43: 931-937.
  14. Berking M, Orth U, Wupperman P, Meier L, Caspar F: Prospective effects of emotion regu- lation on emotional adjustment. J Couns Psy- chol 2008; 55: 485-494.
  15. Berking M, Znoj H: Entwicklung und Vali- dierung eines Fragebogens zur standardisi- erten Selbsteinschatzung emotionaler Kom- petenzen (SEK-27). Z Psychiatr Psychol Psy- chother 2008; 56: 141-152.
  16. Grawe K: Psychological Therapy. Cambridge, Hogrefe and Huber, 2002.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berking, M., Ebert, D., Cuijpers, P., & Hofmann, S. G.
Affiliations
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2013
Volume
82
Issue
4
Pages
234-245
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W2032681891
Cited by
328
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 8
FWCI
24.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (113040, 121576)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH078308., R01MH078308)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, depression treatment efficacy, negative affect, well-being, emotional dysregulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review