The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Bradford Method For Protein Quantitation
Abstract
A rapid and accurate method for the estimation of protein concentration is essential in various areas of biology and biochemistry. An assay originally described by Bradford (1) has become the preferred method for quantifying protein in many laboratories. This technique is simpler, faster, and more sensitive than the Lowry method. Moreover, when compared with the Lowry method, it is subject to less interference by common reagents and non-protein components of biological samples ( see Note 1). Despite the introduction of alternative protein assays, the Bradford method remains a popular technique, with the original article (1) being cited over 3,500 times in primary research papers in 2006, thirty years after its initial publication. The Bradford assay relies on the binding of the dye Coomassie Blue G250 to protein. Detailed studies indicate that the free dye can exist in four different ionic forms for which the pK a values are 1.15, 1.82 and 12.4 (2). Of the three charged forms of the dye that predominate in the acidic assay reagent solution, the more cationic red and green forms have absorbance maxima at 470 nm and 650 nm, respectively. In contrast, the more anionic blue form of the dye, which binds to protein, has an absorbance maximum at 590 nm. Thus, the quantity of protein can be estimated by determining the amount of dye in the blue ionic form. This is usually achieved by measuring the absorbance of the solution at 595 nm ( see Note 2). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bradford, M. M. (1976) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 · Cited by 255,302
A rapid, sensitive, and versatile assay for protein using Coomassie brilliant blue G250
Sedmak, J. J., & Grossberg, S. E. (1977) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(77)90428-6 · Cited by 3,030
Refinement of the Coomassie blue method of protein quantitation
Spector, T. (1978) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(78)90327-5 · Cited by 1,583
Read, S. M., & Northcote, D. H. (1981) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(81)90321-3 · Cited by 1,421
Zor, T., & Selinger, Z. (1996) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1006/abio.1996.0171 · Cited by 1,038
Mechanism of dye response and interference in the Bradford protein assay
Compton, S. J., & Jones, C. G. (1985) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(85)90190-3 · Cited by 640
The Binding Interaction of Coomassie Blue with Proteins
Congdon, R. W., Muth, G. W., & Splittgerber, A. G. (1993) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1006/abio.1993.1439 · Cited by 324
Increased uniformity in the response of the Coomassie blue G protein assay to different proteins
Stoscheck, C. M. (1990) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(90)90021-z · Cited by 145
Adaptation of the dye-binding protein assay to microtiter plates
Redinbaugh, M. G., & Campbell, W. H. (1985) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(85)90020-x · Cited by 129
Sensitivity and variability of the Bradford protein assay in the presence of detergents
Friedenauer, S., & Berlet, H. H. (1989) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(89)90636-2 · Cited by 82
Cited by
Hueso, D., Fontecha, J., & Gómez-Cortés, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.925565 · Cited by 60
Yilmaz, D., Gönüllü, E., Gürsoy, M., Könönen, E., & Gürsoy, U. K. (2021) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1002/jper.20-0632 · Cited by 21
Yadav, Y. C., Singh, A., Kannaujia, S. K., & Yadav, R. (2022) · Pharmacological Research - Modern Chinese Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prmcm.2022.100191 · Cited by 13
The application of bubble column photobioreactor for algal cultivation
O'Higgins, L., Haider, M. N., Verma, N., & Bose, A. (2025) · Algal Bioreactors · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-14058-7.00003-8 · Cited by 6
Illava, G., Gillilan, R., & Ando, N. (2023) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105039 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Kruger, N. J.
- Venue
- Springer Protocols Handbooks
- Publisher
- Humana Press
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 17-24
- ISSN
- 1949-2448 (ISSN-L)
- 1949-2456
- OpenAlex
- W4233971050
- Cited by
- 772
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 3.94
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Bradford Method For Protein Quantitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-59745-198-7_4
- The paper
- Kruger, N. J. (2009). The Bradford Method For Protein Quantitation. Springer Protocols Handbooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-198-7_4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.