Cited by 5Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchGender Roles and Identity StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Masculine Identity and Traumatic Brain Injury

MacQueen, Ruth, Fisher, Paul·2019·The Palgrave Handbook of Male Psychology and Mental Health

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-04384-1_29

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hayes, S., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. New York and London: Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
MacQueen, R., & Fisher, P.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Fisher, Paul
Venue
The Palgrave Handbook of Male Psychology and Mental Health
Published
2019
Pages
601-622
OpenAlex
W2920387403
Cited by
5
References
68
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.78
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, masculinity, gender identity, men, gender differences, rehabilitation, neuropsychological treatment, social roles, autonomy, independence, recovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review