Cited by 103Ethics and Social Impacts of AIAI in Service InteractionsSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender Bias in Chatbot Design

Feine, Jasper, Gnewuch, Ulrich, Morana, Stefan, Maedche, Alexander·2020·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-39540-7_6

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 103

Metadata

Authors
Feine, J., Gnewuch, U., Morana, S., & Maedche, A.
Affiliations
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Corresponding author
Feine, Jasper
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2020
Volume
11970
Pages
79-93
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2999241551
Cited by
99
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5
FWCI
12.19
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Lecture notes in computer science
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
gender bias, chatbot design, face recognition, customer service chatbots, gender stereotypes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review