Cited by 20Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Have You Forgotten? A Method to Assess if Machine Learning Models Have Forgotten Data

Open access
Liu, Xiao, Tsaftaris, Sotirios A.·2020·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-59710-8_10

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, X., & Tsaftaris, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • The Alan Turing Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Liu, Xiao
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2020
Pages
95-105
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W3092391615
Cited by
18
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.22
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • UK Research and Innovation (104690, EP/N510129/1)
  • Royal Academy of Engineering
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (N510129, EP/N510129/, EP/N510129/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Keywords
data deletion, data provenance, data provenance verification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review