BrainTorrent: A Peer-to-Peer Environment for Decentralized Federated Learning
Open accessAbstract
Access to sufficient annotated data is a common challenge in training deep neural networks on medical images. As annotating data is expensive and time-consuming, it is difficult for an individual medical center to reach large enough sample sizes to build their own, personalized models. As an alternative, data from all centers could be pooled to train a centralized model that everyone can use. However, such a strategy is often infeasible due to the privacy-sensitive nature of medical data. Recently, federated learning (FL) has been introduced to collaboratively learn a shared prediction model across centers without the need for sharing data. In FL, clients are locally training models on site-specific datasets for a few epochs and then sharing their model weights with a central server, which orchestrates the overall training process. Importantly, the sharing of models does not compromise patient privacy. A disadvantage of FL is the dependence on a central server, which requires all clients to agree on one trusted central body, and whose failure would disrupt the training process of all clients. In this paper, we introduce BrainTorrent, a new FL framework without a central server, particularly targeted towards medical applications. BrainTorrent presents a highly dynamic peer-to-peer environment, where all centers directly interact with each other without depending on a central body. We demonstrate the overall effectiveness of FL for the challenging task of whole brain segmentation and observe that the proposed server-less BrainTorrent approach does not only outperform the traditional server-based one but reaches a similar performance to a model trained on pooled data.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fully decentralized federated learning removes the central server and lets clients communicate only with one-hop neighbors.
“Therefore, some researches began to study fully decentralized framework where the central server is not required [41, 60, 85, 91]. The local clients are distributed over the graph/network where they only communicate with their one-hop neighbors.”
From Federated Learning for Healthcare Informatics (2021) · cites this paper as [85]
The Introduction (p. 2) and Conclusion (p. 8) describe BrainTorrent as server-less, with clients communicating directly rather than through a central server. The one-hop-neighbor restriction is not supported as a general network rule: Section 2.2 (p. 4) says every client is directly connected to every other client, and an initiating client pings all the others. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data
McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Arcas, B. A. Y. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.05629 · Cited by 14,215 · see citing works
Fischl, B., Salat, D. H., Busa, E., Albert, M., Dieterich, M., Haselgrove, C., van der Kouwe, A., Killiany, R., Kennedy, D., Klaveness, S., et al. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00569-x · Cited by 8,610 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- [1]1. Bonawitz, K., Eichner, H., Grieskamp, W., et al.: Towards federated learning at scale: System design. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.01046 (2019) · arXiv
- [2]2. Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., Marcedone, A., McMahan, H.B., Patel, S., Ramage, D., Segal, A., Seth, K.: Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. pp. 1175-1191. ACM (2017)
- [4]4. French, R.M.: Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks. Trends in cognitive sciences 3 (4), 128-135 (1999)
- [5]5. Koneˇ cn` y, J., McMahan, H.B., et al.: Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05492 (2016) · arXiv
- [6]6. Landman, B., Warfield, S.: Miccai 2012 workshop on multi-atlas labeling. In: MICCAI (2012)
- [7]7. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., y Arcas, B.A.: Communicationefficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In: AISTATS. pp. 12731282 (2017)
- [9]9. Sheller, M.J., Reina, G.A., Edwards, B., Martin, J., Bakas, S.: Multi-institutional deep learning modeling without sharing patient data: A feasibility study on brain tumor segmentation. In: MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop. pp. 92-104. Springer (2018)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The future of digital health with federated learning
Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletarì, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., Bakas, S., Galtier, M. N., Landman, B. A., Maier-Hein, K., et al. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1 · Cited by 3,119 · see citing works
Federated Learning for Healthcare Informatics
Xu, J., Glicksberg, B. S., Su, C., Walker, P., Bian, J., & Wang, F. (2021) · Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.1007/s41666-020-00082-4 · Cited by 1,542 · see citing works
Federated Learning for Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Survey
Nguyen, D. C., Ding, M., Pathirana, P. N., Seneviratne, A., Li, J., & Vincent Poor, H. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3075439 · Cited by 1,503 · see citing works
Federated Learning: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications
Aledhari, M., Razzak, R., Parizi, R. M., & Saeed, F. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3013541 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Algorithmic fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare
Chen, R. J., Wang, J. J., Williamson, D. F. K., Chen, T. Y., Lipkova, J., Lu, M. Y., Sahai, S., & Mahmood, F. (2023) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-023-01056-8 · Cited by 750 · see citing works
Decentralized federated learning: Fundamentals, state of the art, frameworks, trends, and challenges
Martínez Beltrán, E. T., Pérez, M. Q., Sánchez, P. M. S., Bernal, S. L., Bovet, G., Pérez, M. G., Pérez, G. M., & Celdrán, A. H. (2023) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2023.3315746 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
“BrainTorrent [148] is an FL framework without a central server explicitly aimed at medical applications.”
Federated learning for medical image analysis: A survey
Guan, H., Yap, P.-T., Bozoki, A., & Liu, M. (2024) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2024.110424 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Federated Learning With Cooperating Devices: A Consensus Approach for Massive IoT Networks
Savazzi, S., Nicoli, M., & Rampa, V. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2964162 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Federated learning for computational pathology on gigapixel whole slide images
Lu, M. Y., Chen, R. J., Kong, D., Lipkova, J., Singh, R., Williamson, D. F. K., Chen, T. Y., & Mahmood, F. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102298 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Vulnerabilities in federated learning
Bouacida, N., & Mohapatra, P. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3075203 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Linardos, A., Kushibar, K., Walsh, S., Gkontra, P., & Lekadir, K. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07186-4 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
A comprehensive survey on federated learning techniques for healthcare informatics
Dasaradharami Reddy, K., & Gadekallu, T. R. (2023) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2023/8393990 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Lian, Z., Yang, Q., Wang, W., Zeng, Q., Alazab, M., Zhao, H., & Su, C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnse.2022.3175945 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Chain FL: Decentralized Federated Machine Learning via Blockchain
Korkmaz, C., Kocas, H. E., Uysal, A., Masry, A., Ozkasap, O., & Akgun, B. (2020) · 2020 Second International Conference on Blockchain Computing and Applications (BCCA) · doi:10.1109/bcca50787.2020.9274451 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Layer-Based Communication-Efficient Federated Learning with Privacy Preservation
LIAN, Z., WANG, W., HUANG, H., & SU, C. (2022) · IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems · doi:10.1587/transinf.2021bcp0006 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Scaling Neuroscience Research Using Federated Learning
Stripelis, D., Ambite, J. L., Lam, P., & Thompson, P. (2021) · 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi48211.2021.9433925 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Have You Forgotten? A Method to Assess if Machine Learning Models Have Forgotten Data
Liu, X., & Tsaftaris, S. A. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59710-8_10 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Federated Learning for Multi-Center Imaging Diagnostics: A Study in Cardiovascular Disease
Linardos, A., Kushibar, K., Walsh, S., Gkontra, P., & Lekadir, K. (2021) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-688924/v1 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Roy, A. G., Siddiqui, S., Pölsterl, S., Navab, N., & Wachinger, C.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1905.06731
- OpenAlex
- W2945262235
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 13 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- decentralized federated learning, peer learning, medical image segmentation, whole-brain segmentation, data privacy, deep neural network
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
