Cited by 1,313Cultural Insights and Digital ImpactsDigital Humanities and ScholarshipCybernetics and Technology in Society

Cybertext

Aarseth, Espen·1997·Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.56021/9780801855788

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Games can be seen as interactive systems.

    “As shown earlier, and argued more thoroughly by e.g.Crookall et al (1987), Aarseth (1997) and Salen and Zimmerman (2004) games can be seen as interactive systems 1 .”

    From Do We Need Real-Time Hermeneutics? Structures of Meaning in Games (2011) · cites this paper as Aarseth (1997)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aarseth, E.
Corresponding author
Aarseth, Espen
Venue
Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks
Published
1997
OpenAlex
W4319778522
Cited by
1,313
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 73 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 134 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 38
FWCI
5.07
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
cybertext, digital literature, hypertext

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review