Cited by 19Misinformation and Its ImpactsSpam and Phishing DetectionEthics and Social Impacts of AI

New Automation for Social Bots: From Trivial Behavior to AI-Powered Communication

Grimme, Christian, Pohl, Janina, Cresci, Stefano, Lüling, Ralf, Preuss, Mike·2022·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-18253-2_6

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LLMs have the potential to enhance the capabilities of social bots.

    “LLMs also have the potential to enhance the capabilities of social bots, akin to previously mentioned cyber-social threats (Grimme et al., 2022;Ferrara, 2023).”

    From Anatomy of an AI-powered malicious social botnet (2024) · cites this paper as Grimme et al., 2022

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grimme, C., Pohl, J., Cresci, S., Lüling, R., & Preuss, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IT)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Grimme, Christian
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2022
Pages
79-99
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4313066228
Cited by
19
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
8.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
social bots, social media automation, content creation, AI-generated content, computer-mediated communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review