Cited by 1Child Development and Digital TechnologyLanguage Development and DisordersEarly Childhood Education and Development

Digital Media Use and Language Development in Early Childhood

Open access
Dore, Rebecca A., Jing, Mengguo, Taylor, Gemma, Madigan, Sheri, Samudra, Preeti G., Sundqvist, Annette S., Xu, Ying·2025·Handbook of Children and Screens

Abstract

The pervasiveness of digital media and the importance of language skills underscore a pressing need to understand the role of media in language development. Historically, research has focused on the quantity of children’s media use but there has been a recent focus on content (i.e., the kinds of media that children use), context (i.e., who children use media with), and interactivity (i.e., whether children watch content passively or can respond contingently) as well as technoference (i.e., adult technology use around children). Meta-analyses suggest that while associations between media quantity and early language skills are either negative or null, both educational content (intending to convey knowledge) and co-use (use with others) are often associated with stronger skills, whereas adult technology use can disrupt parent–child interactions. Some researchers have also argued that interactive media that can respond contingently to children may support language, although more research is needed. Here, we focus on these aspects of media use and their associations with children’s language development in early childhood (0–6 years). We review the current literature, propose important directions for future research, and provide recommendations for researchers in this area and for various stakeholder groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-69362-5_6

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preschoolers are generally better able to learn language from educational media due to more mature brains and flexible memory.

    “However, preschoolers tend to be more capable of language learning through educational media because of greater brain maturation and memory flexibility.81”

    From Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents: Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [81]

    Section 2.1 (Content) says preschoolers can learn words from well-designed educational media and reports a hypothesis that their developmental readiness reflects improved memory flexibility and greater understanding of media’s symbolic nature. It does not identify greater brain maturation as the mechanism, and it presents the developmental explanation as a hypothesis rather than an established cause. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Mutz DC, Roberts DF, Vuuren DV. Reconsidering the displacement hypothesis: Television's influence on children's time use. Commun Res. 1993;20(1):51-75.
  2. Khan KS, et al. Association between television view- ing and parent-child reading in the early home envi- ronment. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2017;38(7):521-7.
  3. Jing M, Ye T, Kirkorian H, Mares L. Screen media exposure and young children's vocabulary learn- ing and development: a meta-analysis. Child Dev. 2023;94:1398-418.
  4. Barr RF. Growing up in the digital age: early learn- ing and family media ecology. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. Published online 2019:096372141983824. https://doi. org/10.1177/0963721419838245. · DOI · Paper page
  5. DeLoache JS, Chiong C, Sherman K, et al. Do babies learn from baby media? Psychol Sci. 2010; 21(11):1570-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610 384145. · DOI
  6. Strouse GA, Samson JE. Learning from video: a meta-analysis of the video deficit in children ages 0 to 6 years. Child Dev. 2021;92(1):e20-38. https://doi. org/10.1111/cdev.13429. · DOI
  7. Roseberry S, Hirsh-Pasek K, Golinkoff RM. Skype me! Socially contingent interactions help toddlers learn language. Child Dev. 2014;85(3):956-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12166. · DOI
  8. Kirkorian HL, Choi K. Associations between tod- dlers' naturalistic media experience and observed learning from screens. Infancy. 2016;2007:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12171. · DOI
  9. Dore RA, et al. Education in the app store: using a mobile game to support US preschoolers' vocabulary learning. J Child Media. 2019;13(4):452-71.
  10. Parish-Morris J, et al. Once upon a time: parent-child dialogue and storybook reading in the electronic era. Mind Brain Educ. 2013;7(3):200-11.
  11. Strouse GA, Troseth GL. Supporting toddlers' transfer of word learning from video. Cogn Dev. 2014;30(1):47-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cogdev.2014.01.002. · DOI
  12. Ewin CA, Reupert AE, McLean LA, Ewin CJ. The impact of joint media engagement on parent-child interactions: a systematic review. Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2021;3(2):230-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/ hbe2.203. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Zimmerman FJ, et al. Teaching by listening: the importance of adult-child conversations to language development. Pediatrics. 2009;124(1):342-9.
  14. Strouse GA, O'Doherty K, Troseth GL. Effective coviewing: preschoolers' learning from video after a dialogic questioning intervention. Dev Psychol. 2013;49(12):2368-82. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0032463. · DOI
  15. Troseth GL, Strouse GA, Flores I, Stuckelman ZD, Johnson CR. An enhanced eBook facilitates parent- child talk during shared reading by families of low socioeconomic status. Early Child Res Q. 2020:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.02.009. · DOI
  16. Lavigne HJ, Hanson KG, Anderson DR. The influence of television coviewing on parent language directed at toddlers. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2015;36:1-10. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.004. · DOI
  17. Kirkorian HL, Choi K, Pempek TA. Toddlers' word learning from contingent and non-contingent video on touchscreens. Child Dev. 2016;29(1):91-102. https:// doi.org/10.3233/SW-140134. · DOI
  18. Russo-Johnson C, Troseth GL, Duncan C, Mesghina A. All tapped out: touchscreen interactivity and young children's word learning. Front Psychol. 2017;8(April):578. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2017.00578. · DOI
  19. Xu Y, Aubele J, Vigil V, Bustamante AS, Kim YS, Warschauer M. Dialogue with a conversational agent promotes children's story comprehension via enhanc- ing engagement. Child Dev. 2022;93(2):e149-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13708. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Xu Y, Wang D, Collins P, Lee H, Warschauer M. Same benefits, different communication pat- terns: comparing Children's reading with a conver- sational agent vs. a human partner. Comput Educ. 2021;2021(161):104059. https://doi.org/10.1007/ bf02527095. · DOI
  21. Reed J, Hirsh-pasek K, Golinkoff RM. Learning on hold: cell phones sidetrack parent-child interactions. Dev Psychol. 2017;53:1428-36.
  22. Morris AJ, Filippetti ML, Rigato S. The impact of parents' smartphone use on language devel- opment in young children. Child Dev Perspect. 2022;16(2):103-9.
  23. McArthur BA, Browne D, Tough S, Madigan S. Trajectories of screen use during early child- hood: predictors and associated behavior and learn- ing outcomes. Comput Hum Behav. Published online 2020:106501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2020.106501. · DOI
  24. Valkenburg PM, Peter J. The differential sus- ceptibility to media effects model. J Commun. 2013;63(2):221-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom. 12024. · DOI · Paper page
  25. McArthur BA, Hentges R, Christakis DA, McDonald S, Tough S, Madigan S. Cumulative social risk and child screen use: the role of child temperament. J Pediatr Psychol. 2022;47(2):171-9. https://doi. org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsab087. · DOI
  26. Taylor G, Monaghan P, Westermann G. Investigating the association between children's screen media expo- sure and vocabulary size in the UK. J Child Media. 2018;12(1):51-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798 .2017.1365737. · DOI
  27. Dore RA, Logan J, Lin TJ, Purtell KM, Justice LM. Characteristics of children's media use and gains in language and literacy skills. Front Psychol. 2020;11:2224. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2020.02224. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dore, R. A., Jing, M., Taylor, G., Madigan, S., Samudra, P. G., Sundqvist, A. S., & Xu, Y.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Boston College (US)
  • University of Salford (GB)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • SUNY Plattsburgh (US)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Dore, Rebecca A.
Venue
Handbook of Children and Screens
Published
2024-12-06
Pages
39-45
OpenAlex
W4405089631
Cited by
1
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
2.93
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
: Institute of Digital Media and Child Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
digital media use, language development, early childhood, co-use, parent-child interaction, technoference, interactive media, media context

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review