Cited by 1,340Media Influence and HealthMedia Studies and CommunicationMedia and Digital Communication

The Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model

Valkenburg, Patti M., Peter, Jochen·2013·Journal of Communication

Abstract

In this theoretical article, we introduce the Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model (DSMM), a new, integrative model to improve our understanding of media effects. The DSMM organizes, integrates, and extends the insights developed in earlier microlevel media-effects theories. It distinguishes 3 types of susceptibility to media effects: dispositional, developmental, and social susceptibility. Using the analogy of a mixing console, the DSMM proposes 3 media response states that mediate media effects: cognitive, emotional, and excitative. The assumptions on which the DSMM is based together explain (a) why some individuals are more highly susceptible to media effects than others, (b) how and why media influence those individuals, and (c) how media effects can be enhanced or counteracted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcom.12024

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such aggregate statistics are typically derived from heterogeneous samples of adolescents who may differ greatly in their susceptibilities to environmental influences in general and media influences in particular.

    “Such statistics are typically derived from heterogeneous samples of adolescents who may differ greatly in their susceptibilities to the effects of environmental influences in general [53] and media influences in particular[54]”
  • Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model suggests that users in certain developmental periods may be more susceptible to either positive or negative outcomes from SMU.

    “This aligns with Valkenburg and Peter's (2013) Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model, which suggests that users in certain developmental periods may be more susceptible to either positive or negative outcomes from SMU.”
  • Both media effects theories and theories of developmental psychopathology emphasize that youth may differ considerably in the degree to which environmental factors influence them.

    “Both media effects theories (e.g., differential susceptibility model; Valkenburg & Peter, 2013) and theories of developmental psychopathology (e.g., neurobiological sensitivity to context theories; Ellis et al., 2011) emphasize that youth may differ considerably in the degree to which environmental factors influence them.”
  • Media effects theories propose that each adolescent may have a unique susceptibility to the effects of social media.

    “In line with the proposition of media effects theories that each adolescent may have a unique susceptibility to the effects of social media17, a viable explanation for the small and inconsistent findings in earlier studies may be that the effect of social media differs from adolescent to adolescent.”
  • It provides firm support for the Social Compensation hypothesis.

    “Moreover, it provides firm support for the Social Compensation hypothesis, which is concerned with how online interaction can generate a host of benefits for individuals struggling with face-to-face interaction due to lack of social skills or low well-being [133], especially during the pandemic.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Journal of Communication
Published
2013-03-07
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
221-243
ISSN
0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1633245909
Cited by
1,340
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 222 · 2025: 177 · 2024: 161 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 146 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
608.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
media influence, differential susceptibility, cognitive responses, emotional responses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review