Cited by 1Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior

Evolution and Development of Insect Metamorphosis: A Case of Genetic Accommodation?

Nagata, Hana, Tanaka, Kohtaro, Suzuki, Yuichiro·2026·Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation

Abstract

For centuries, the evolution of complete metamorphosis in insects (holometaboly) has captured the imagination of philosophers and scientists. Recent discoveries using model organisms and experimental organisms have greatly advanced our understanding of the molecular regulators of metamorphosis. Drawing on these discoveries and insights gained from the evolution of direct development and metamorphosis in other taxa, we propose that the larval stage found in holometabolous insects may have evolved from a developmentally plastic embryo through the process of genetic accommodation. We highlight the need to study additional species that are phylogenetically closer to the hypothetical common ancestor of holometabolous insects and can serve as a surrogate for this hypothetical insect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-032-06766-1_7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although chinmo and broad work in concert to direct the progressive growth of the nymph, only chinmo is involved in the regulation of E93.

    “Although chinmo and broad work in concert to direct the progressive growth of the nymph, only chinmo is involved in the regulation of E93 [44,43].”

    From Regulation of metamorphosis in holometabolous insects (2026) · cites this paper as [44]

  • The timing and functions of chinmo and broad support the pattern of combined growth and differentiation in hemimetabolous nymphs versus their separation in holometabolous larvae.

    “As pointed out by Nagata et al. [44], the timing and functions of chinmo and broad support this pattern.”

    From Regulation of metamorphosis in holometabolous insects (2026) · cites this paper as [44]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagata, H., Tanaka, K., & Suzuki, Y.
Affiliations
Wellesley College (US)
Corresponding author
Suzuki, Yuichiro
Venue
Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation
Published
2025-11-23
Volume
76
Pages
117-150
ISSN
  • 0080-1844 (ISSN-L)
  • 1861-0412
OpenAlex
W4416539079
Cited by
1
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
2.14
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Results and problems in cell differentiation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Keywords
insect metamorphosis, genetic accommodation, larval evolution, developmental plasticity, direct development, evolutionary developmental biology, insect phylogeny
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Insecta, Larva, Metamorphosis, Biological, Phylogeny

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review