CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 102Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorPsychology of Development and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 176 of the 180 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolution and Children’s Cognitive and Academic Development

Geary, David C., Berch, Daniel B.·2016·Evolutionary Psychology
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-29986-0_9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-29986-0_9

Cites

176 of 176 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 180 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Berch, D. B. (2007). Instructing evolved minds: Pedagogically primary strategies for promoting biologically secondary learning. In J. S. Carlson & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Educating the evolved mind (Psychological perspectives on contemporary educational issues, Vol. 2, pp. 109–118). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  2. Berch, D. B. (2008, November). The emerging field of “evo-edu”: Questions, challenges, constraints, and caveats. Presented at the Evolution Institute Workshop on Early Childhood Education, Miami, FL.
  3. Berlinski, D. (2000). Newton’s gift. New York, NY: Touchstone.
  4. Bogin, B. (1999). Patterns of human growth (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Dunbar, K., Fugelsang, J., & Stein, C. (2007). Do naïve theories ever go away? In M. Lovett & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with Data: 33rd Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 193–205). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  6. Geary, D. C., Berch, D. B., & Mann Koepke, K. (Eds.). (2015). Evolutionary origins and early development of number processing (Mathematical cognition and learning, Vol. 1). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
  7. Harter, S. (2006). The self. In N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Social, emotional, and personality development, Vol. 3 (pp. 505–570). W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Gen. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th Ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–102 of 102

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Geary, D. C., & Berch, D. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Geary, David C.
ORCID
Venue
Evolutionary Psychology
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2016
Pages
217-249
ISSN
  • 2197-9898 (ISSN-L)
  • 2197-9901
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-29986-0_9
OpenAlex
W2460574198
Cited by
101
References
180
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
FWCI
20.66
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
Evolutionary psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
Keywords
child cognitive development, academic development, folk psychology, folk biology, folk physics, cognitive biases, motivational biases, educational intervention design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review