Cited by 55Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in Robotics3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

Robobarista: Object part-based transfer of manipulation trajectories from crowd-sourcing in 3d pointclouds

Open access
Sung, Jaeyong, Jin, Seok Hyun, Saxena, Ashutosh·2018·Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-60916-4_40

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anticipating human activities has been shown to improve human-robot collaboration.

    “Anticipating human activities has been shown to improve human-robot collaboration [40, 21, 25, 10].”

    From Recurrent Neural Networks for driver activity anticipation via sensory-fusion architecture (2016) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Related Work section mentions human activity detection but does not say that anticipating activities improves human-robot collaboration. Searches for activity anticipation and collaborative outcomes returned passages about object manipulation planning instead, so our copy does not address the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Workshop, Intelligent User Interfaces Conference, pages 10–12, 2013.
  2. [59]I. Tsochantaridis, T. Joachims, T. Hofmann, Y. Altun, and Y. Singer. Large margin methods for structured and interdependent output variables. JMLR, 6(9), 2005.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sung, J., Jin, S. H., & Saxena, A.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Sung, Jaeyong
Venue
Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics
Published
2017-07-25
Pages
701-720
ISSN
  • 2511-1256 (ISSN-L)
  • 2511-1264
OpenAlex
W1925737941
Cited by
52
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2
FWCI
25.80
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Springer proceedings in advanced robotics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Army Research Office
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
manipulation planning, household appliances, 3D point clouds, structured prediction, deep learning, multimodal learning, language teaching, unseen object generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review