The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Concept
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, when narcissists believe that self-promotion is less likely to grant status, they might follow a combative behavior that aims to devalue social competitors (rivalry pathway; Back, 2018; Back et al., 2013).”
From The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit (2020) · cites this paper as Back, 2018
In the citing paper
“Over time, the frequency with which individuals pursue status through admiration or rivalry may crystallize into more stable, trait-like patterns that represent between-person differences in admiration and rivalry (Back, 2018).”
From The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit (2020) · cites this paper as Back, 2018
Citations
Cites
Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational Principle
Higgins, E. T. (1998) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60381-0 · Cited by 3,511
Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890 · Cited by 2,273
(2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315736945-36 · Cited by 2,232
Unraveling the Paradoxes of Narcissism: A Dynamic Self-Regulatory Processing Model
Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1204_1 · Cited by 2,215
Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.219 · Cited by 2,113
Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory.
Pincus, A. L., Ansell, E. B., Pimentel, C. A., Cain, N. M., Wright, A. G. C., & Levy, K. N. (2009) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0016530 · Cited by 1,334
Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism.
Back, M. D., Küfner, A. C. P., Dufner, M., Gerlach, T. M., Rauthmann, J. F., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034431 · Cited by 1,255
Self-citationInterpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self enhancement: a mixed blessing?
Paulhus, D. L. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1197 · Cited by 1,114
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences
Nȩcka, E. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8 · Cited by 1,114
Wink, P. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.590 · Cited by 1,107
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Grosz, M. P., Göllner, R., Rose, N., Spengler, M., Trautwein, U., Rauthmann, J. F., et al. (in press). The development of narcissistic admiration and Machiavellianism in early adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
- Paulhus, D. L. (2001). Normal narcissism: Two minimalist accounts. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 228–230.
- Sedikides, C., Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G., Elliot, A. J., & Gregg, A. P. (2002). Do others bring out the worst in narcissists? The “others exist for me” illusion. In Y. Kashima, M. Foddy, & M. Platow (Eds.), Self and identity: Personal, social, and symbolic (pp. 103–124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Narcissism Today: What We Know and What We Need to Learn
Miller, J. D., Back, M. D., Lynam, D. R., & Wright, A. G. C. (2021) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09637214211044109 · Cited by 374
Self-citationThe "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit
Grapsas, S., Brummelman, E., Back, M. D., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619873350 · Cited by 312
“However, when narcissists believe that self-promotion is less likely to grant status, they might follow a combative behavior that aims to devalue social competitors (rivalry pathway; Back, 2018; Back et al., 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationThe dynamics, processes, mechanisms, and functioning of personality: An overview of the field
Kuper, N., Modersitzki, N., Phan, L. V., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2021) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12486 · Cited by 119
Weidmann, R., Chopik, W. J., Ackerman, R. A., Allroggen, M., Bianchi, E. C., Brecheen, C., Campbell, W. K., Gerlach, T. M., Geukes, K., Grijalva, E. J., et al. (2023) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000463 · Cited by 129
Self-citationRogoza, R., Cieciuch, J., Strus, W., & Baran, T. (2019) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2206 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Back, M. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Münster (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Back, Mitja D.
- ORCID
- Back, Mitja D.
- Venue
- Handbook of Trait Narcissism
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 57-67
- OpenAlex
- W2893769773
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 128.48
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- grandiose narcissism, narcissistic admiration, narcissistic rivalry, self-regulation, social potency, interpersonal conflict
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
