Cited by 38Spatial Cognition and NavigationData Visualization and AnalyticsGeographic Information Systems Studies

User-Centered Design of Landmark Visualizations

Elias, Birgit, Paelke, Volker·2008·Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-37110-6_3

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cartographic design guidelines of Elias and Paelke (2008) constitute adequate means for retaining the visual information of landmarks, such as color and texture, on mobile maps.

    “Even though the cartographic design guidelines of Elias and Paelke (2008) were not assessed in a navigation context, they constitute adequate means for retaining the visual information of landmarks, such as color and texture, on mobile maps.”
  • The lack of direct influence of landmark visualization styles on spatial learning measures can be attributed to depicting landmarks as 3D building models in both conditions on the mobile map providing the necessary visual information to facilitate basic spatial learning required to solve the navigation task.

    “The lack of direct influence of landmark visualization styles on spatial learning measures can be attributed to the fact that depicting landmarks as 3D building models in both conditions on the mobile map could have provided the necessary visual information to facilitate the basic spatial learning required to solve the navigation task (Chrastil & Warren, 2012; Elias & Paelke, 2008; Kapaj et al., 2”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elias, B., & Paelke, V.
Affiliations
Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography
Published
2008-02-19
Pages
33-56
OpenAlex
W184706225
Cited by
38
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.60
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographic Information Systems Studies
Keywords
landmark-based navigation, mobile maps, in-vehicle navigation, personal navigation system, spatial cognition, levels of abstraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review