The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design and Implementation of a Secure Modbus Protocol
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Our solution overheads only 1.6% time delay compared to 66% time delay or latency as per [51].It adds 4% overhead on frame size, compared to 291% as per [33].”
From Detection and Blocking of Replay, False Command, and False Access Injection Commands in SCADA Systems with Modbus Protocol (2021) · cites this paper as [33]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It adds 4% overhead on frame size, compared to 291% as per [33].”
From Detection and Blocking of Replay, False Command, and False Access Injection Commands in SCADA Systems with Modbus Protocol (2021) · cites this paper as [33]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, both of these works do not consider the confidentiality requirement for Modbus messages, as they are usually implemented using cryptography, which is expensive and presents a considerable overhead that can affect the performance in real-time communication [15,16].”
From Enhanced Modbus/TCP Security Protocol: Authentication and Authorization Functions Supported (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems
Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., & Adleman, L. (1978) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359340.359342 · Cited by 13,462
A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems
Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., & Adleman, L. (1983) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/357980.358017 · Cited by 13,012
Computer Security: Art and Science
Bishop, M. (2002) · Cited by 1,234
Attack taxonomies for the Modbus protocols
Huitsing, P., Chandia, R., Papa, M., & Shenoi, S. (2008) · International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection · doi:10.1016/j.ijcip.2008.08.003 · Cited by 249
Security Strategies for SCADA Networks
Chandia, R., Gonzalez, J., Kilpatrick, T., Papa, M., & Shenoi, S. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-75462-8_9 · Cited by 87
Security Vulnerabilities in Software Systems: A Quantitative Perspective
Alhazmi, O. H., Malaiya, Y. K., & Ray, I. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11535706_21 · Cited by 75
Low-Latency Cryptographic Protection for SCADA Communications
Wright, A. K., Kinast, J. A., & McCarty, J. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24852-1_19 · Cited by 69
Critical Infrastructure Protection II
Papa, M., & Shenoi, S. (2009) · IFIP International Federation for Information Processing/IFIP · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-88523-0 · Cited by 59
Industrial cybersecurity for a power system and SCADA networks - Be secure
Creery, A., & Byres, E. J. (2007) · IEEE Industry Applications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mia.2007.4283509 · Cited by 49
Risk Management for Computer Security: Protecting Your Network & Information Assets
Jones, A., & Ashenden, D. (2005) · Butterworth-Heinemann eBooks · Cited by 48
Effects of intentional threats to power substation control systems
Dondossola, G., Szanto, J., Masera, M., & Fovino, I. N. (2007) · International Journal of Critical Infrastructures · doi:10.1504/ijcis.2008.016096 · Cited by 47
Self-citationData Object Based Security for DNP3 Over TCP/IP for Increased Utility Commercial Aspects Security
Mander, T., Nabhani, F., Wang, L., & Cheung, R. (2007) · IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting · doi:10.1109/pes.2007.386243 · Cited by 42
BACnet Wide Area Network Security Threat Assessment
Holmberg, D. G., Holmberg, D. G., & Evans, D. L. (2003) · Cited by 34
BACnet wide area network security threat assessment
Holmberg, D. G. (2003) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.7009 · Cited by 34
Scada Malware, a Proof of Concept
Carcano, A., Fovino, I. N., Masera, M., & Trombetta, A. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03552-4_19 · Cited by 31
Self-citationData and Applications Security XIX
(2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11535706 · Cited by 29
Simulating malware with MAlSim
Leszczyna, R., Nai Fovino, I., & Masera, M. (2010) · Journal in Computer Virology · doi:10.1007/s11416-008-0088-y · Cited by 23
Self-citationA Security Mechanism for Automation Control in PLC-based Networks
Heo, J., Hong, C. S., Ju, S., Lim, Y. H., Lee, B. S., & Hyun, D.-H. (2007) · IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and Its Applications (ISPLC) · doi:10.1109/isplc.2007.371169 · Cited by 21
Security Assessment Of A Turbo-Gas Power Plant
Masera, M., Fovino, I. N., & Leszczyna, R. (2010) · IFIP International Federation for Information Processing/IFIP · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-88523-0_3 · Cited by 15
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- M. Majdalawieh, F. Parisi-Presicce and D. Wijesekera, DNPSec: Distributed Network Protocol Version 3 security framework, presented at the Twenty-First Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (Technology Blitz Session), 2005.
- M. Wiener, H. Handschuh, P. Pallier, R. Rivest, E. Biham and L. Knudsen, Performance comparison of public-key cryptosystems, smartcard crypto-coprocessors for public-key cryptography, chaffing and winnowing: Confidentiality without encryption, DES, Triple-DES and AES, CryptoBytes, vol. 4(1), 1998.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cyber–Physical System Security for the Electric Power Grid
Sridhar, S., Hahn, A., & Govindarasu, M. (2011) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2011.2165269 · Cited by 1,219
Cyber-Physical Systems Security—A Survey
Humayed, A., Lin, J., Li, F., & Luo, B. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2703172 · Cited by 1,185
A Survey on SCADA Systems: Secure Protocols, Incidents, Threats and Tactics
Pliatsios, D., Sarigiannidis, P., Lagkas, T., & Sarigiannidis, A. G. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2987688 · Cited by 320
“Authors in [102] describe a modified version of the Modbus protocol that utilizes anti-replay techniques and authentication mechanisms.”
BackgroundIntegration of IoT in building energy infrastructure: A critical review on challenges and solutions
Moudgil, V., Hewage, K., Hussain, S. A., & Sadiq, R. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.113121 · Cited by 124
Security Challenges in Control Network Protocols: A Survey
Volkova, A., Niedermeier, M., Basmadjian, R., & de Meer, H. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2872114 · Cited by 118
“, in [28] (referred to as Modbus-F2009 from here on), [29] (referred to as Modbus-S2015 from here on), and [30] (referred to as Modbus-A2018 from here on).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Fovino, I. N., Carcano, A., Masera, M., & Trombetta, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Insubria (IT)
- Venue
- IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 83-96
- ISSN
- 1868-422X (ISSN-L)
- 1868-4238
- OpenAlex
- W2102662195
- Semantic Scholar
- 6f6e477a9e2bcafcc94f5b13cf8cbf6ab694ecc7
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- IFIP advances in information and communication technology (publishedVersion)
- Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Industrial Automation and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
- Keywords
- Modbus, SCADA security, authentication, non-repudiation, critical infrastructure protection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
