Cited by 154Tactile and Sensory InteractionsDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

No-Look Notes: Accessible Eyes-Free Multi-touch Text Entry

Bonner, Matthew N., Brudvik, Jeremy T., Abowd, Gregory D., Edwards, W. Keith·2010·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-12654-3_24

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most work on non-visual text-entry for people with visual impairments has focused on comparison of input techniques reporting performance measures such as accuracy and speed.

    “Most work on non-visual text-entry for people with visual impairments has focused on the comparison of input techniques reporting on performance measures, such as accuracy and speed.”

    From Typing Performance of Blind Users (2015) · cites this paper as [3]

  • Non-visual input is slow and error prone, especially for novice users.

    “While researchers have been able to establish that non-visual input is slow and error prone, there is little understanding on how to improve it.”

    From Typing Performance of Blind Users (2015) · cites this paper as [3]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonner, M. N., Brudvik, J. T., Abowd, G. D., & Edwards, W. K.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2010
Pages
409-426
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W1480985346
Cited by
154
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
FWCI
29.10
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
multi-touch input, blind users, assistive technology, audio feedback, voice-over, iPhone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review