Cited by 1,214Computational and Text Analysis MethodsSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningTopic Modeling

Comparing Twitter and Traditional Media Using Topic Models

Zhao, Wayne Xin, Jiang, Jing, Weng, Jianshu, He, Jing, Lim, Ee-Peng, Yan, Hongfei, Li, Xiaoming·2011·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-20161-5_34

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, W. X., Jiang, J., Weng, J., He, J., Lim, E.-P., Yan, H., & Li, X.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Singapore Management University (SG)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2011
Pages
338-349
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2168332560
Cited by
1,214
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 106 · 2018: 144 · 2017: 140 · 2016: 156 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 32
FWCI
125.47
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
Twitter, New York Times, social media news, news media comparison, topic modeling, topic categories, retweets, text mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review