Cited by 73Usability and User Interface DesignInnovative Human-Technology InteractionMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation

Human-Computer Interaction: The Agency Perspective

Marielba Zacarias, José Valente de Oliveira·2012·Studies in Computational Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-25691-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zacarias, M., & de Oliveira, J. V.
Affiliations
University of Algarve (PT)
Venue
Studies in Computational Intelligence
Published
2012
ISSN
  • 1860-949X (ISSN-L)
  • 1860-9503
OpenAlex
W61744013
Cited by
72
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.39
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Studies in computational intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Keywords
agency perspective, accessibility, collective agents, organizational agents, social actors, human-computer interaction, interface design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review