Cited by 98Digital Mental Health InterventionsSocial Robot Interaction and HRIMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Self-Guided Web-Based Interventions: Scoping Review on User Needs and the Potential of Embodied Conversational Agents to Address Them

Open access
Scholten, Mark R, Kelders, Saskia M, Van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia EWC·2017·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Web-based mental health interventions have evolved from innovative prototypes to evidence-based and clinically applied solutions for mental diseases such as depression and anxiety. Open-access, self-guided types of these solutions hold the promise of reaching and treating a large population at a reasonable cost. However, a considerable factor that currently hinders the effectiveness of these self-guided Web-based interventions is the high level of nonadherence. The absence of a human caregiver apparently has a negative effect on user adherence. It is unknown to what extent this human support can be handed over to the technology of the intervention to mitigate this negative effect. OBJECTIVE: The first objective of this paper was to explore what is known in literature about what support a user needs to stay motivated and engaged in an electronic health (eHealth) intervention that requires repeated use. The second objective was to explore the current potential of embodied conversational agents (ECAs) to provide this support. METHODS: This study reviews and interprets the available literature on (1) support within eHealth interventions that require repeated use and (2) the potential of ECAs by means of a scoping review. The rationale for choosing a scoping review is that the subject is broad, diverse, and largely unexplored. Themes for (1) and (2) were proposed based on grounded theory and mapped on each other to find relationships. RESULTS: The results of the first part of this study suggest the presence of user needs that largely remain implicit and unaddressed. These support needs can be categorized as task-related support and emotion-related support. The results of the second part of this study suggest that ECAs are capable of engaging and motivating users of information technology applications in the domains of learning and behavioral change. Longitudinal studies must be conducted to determine under what circumstances ECAs can create and maintain a productive user relationship. Mapping the user needs on the ECAs' capabilities suggests that different kinds of ECAs may provide different solutions for improving the adherence levels. CONCLUSIONS: Autonomous ECAs that do not respond to a user's expressed emotion in real time but take on empathic roles may be sufficient to motivate users to some extent. It is unclear whether those types of ECAs are competent enough and create sufficient believability among users to address the user's deeper needs for support and empathy. Responsive ECAs may offer a better solution. However, at present, most of these ECAs have difficulties to assess a user's emotional state in real time during an open dialogue. By conducting future research with relationship theory-based ECAs, the added value of ECAs toward user needs can be better understood.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.7351

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of extant systematic reviews on AI chatbots, 6 targeted assessing efficacy in enhancing mental health outcomes, 2 examined feasibility in health care settings, and 1 described technical architectures and characteristics in chronic conditions.

    “Of the extant systematic reviews on AI chatbots, 6 articles targeted at assessing efficacy of AI-chatbots in enhancing mental health outcomes [1,7,9-12], 2 examined the feasibility of AI-chatbots in health care settings [8,13], and 1 described the technical architectures and characteristics of the AI chatbots used in chronic conditions [14].”

    From Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots for Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: Systematic Review. (2023) · cites this paper as [13]

    The citation [1] identifies this paper as one of six reviews assessing AI chatbots’ efficacy for mental health outcomes. Its Introduction (page unavailable) instead states that its aim was to analyze users’ needs and the capabilities of embodied conversational agents to meet them, with a view to improving adherence—not to assess efficacy on mental health outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Because many literature studies in the contextual inquiry have a broad setup, it is often not possible or desirable to include a quality appraisal or only include experimental studies.

    “Third, because many literature studies in the contextual inquiry have a broad setup, it is often not possible or desirable to include a quality appraisal or only include experimental studies.”
  • Existing systematic and scoping reviews of conversational agent interventions in mental health have focused on a subset of conversational agents with a visual character (embodied) or are now outdated.

    “Recent existing reviews have focused exclusively on a subset of embodied conversational agent interventions despite other modalities aiming to achieve the common goal of improved mental health.”
  • Patients' adherence poses a major challenge for computer-based therapies.

    “In this vein, the patients' adherence still poses a major challenge for computer-based therapies that have to be addressed in future work (53).”
  • Recent meta-analyses demonstrated that embodied CAs delivering help programs are successful treatments, particularly when human-supported.

    “Likewise, recent meta-analyses demonstrated that embodied CAs delivering help programs are successful treatments (31, 53), particularly when being human-supported, e.g., due to an increased adherence (54).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [18]Jordine K Wilson DM Sakpal R Stephanidis C Antona M What is age's affect in collaborative learning environments? Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. User and Context Diversity. UAHCI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8010 2013 Berlin, Heidelberg Springer
  2. [19]Ieronutti L Chittaro L Employing virtual humans for education and training in X3D/VRML worlds Comput Educ 2005 49 1 93 109 10.1016/j.compedu.06 · DOI
  3. [20]Hofmann H Tobisch V Ehrlich U Berton A Evaluation of speech-based HMI concepts for information exchange tasks: a driving simulator study Comput Speech Lang 2015 9 01 33 1 109 135 10.1016/j.csl.01 · DOI
  4. [21]Novick D Gris I Kurosu M Building rapport between human and ECA: a pilot study Human-Computer Interaction. Advanced Interaction Modalities and Techniques. HCI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8511 2014 Cham Springer
  5. [51]Reeves B Nass C The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places (CSLI Lecture Notes S) 1996 Cambridge, UK CSLI Publications and Cambridge University Press
  6. [55]Baylor AL Ryu J Shen E The effects of pedagogical agent voice and animation on learning, motivation and perceived persona 2003 Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2003 Honolulu, Hawaii, USA June 23-28, 2003 452 458
  7. [56]Cowell AJ Stanney KM Rist T Aylett RS Ballin D Rickel J Embodiment and interaction guidelines for designing credible, trustworthy embodied conversational agents Intelligent Virtual Agents. IVA 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2792 2003 Berlin, Heidelberg Springer 301 309
  8. [65]Zanbaka C Ulinski A Goolkasian P Hodges LF Effects of virtual human presence on task performance 2004 Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence (ICAT) 2004 Coex, Korea 174 181
  9. [67]Creed C Beale R Cowan B The impact of an embodied agent's emotional expressions over multiple interactions Interact Comput 2015 3 27 2 172 188 10.1093/iwc/iwt · DOI
  10. [70]Kang SH Gratch J Wang N Watt JH Does the contingency of agents' nonverbal feedback affect users' social anxiety? 2008 5 Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 1; 2008 May 12-16, 2008 Estoril, Portugal 120 127
  11. [78]Doirado E Martinho C I mean it!: detecting user intentions to create believable behaviour for virtual agents in games 2010 Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems May 10-14, 2010 Toronto, Canada 83 90
  12. [84]Moreno R Software agents in multimedia: an experimental study of their contributions to students? learning 2001 Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction International August 5-10, 2001 New Orleans, USA 275 277
  13. [87]Hartholt A Traum D Marsella SC Shapiro A Stratou G Leuski A Morency LP Gratch J All together now 2013 Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intelligent Virtual Agents August 29-31, 2013 Edinburgh, UK

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scholten, M. R., Kelders, S. M., & Van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Twente (NL)
  • North-West University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Scholten, Mark R
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2017-11-16
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
e383
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768275546
Cited by
97
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
embodied conversational agents, e-health, user adherence, user needs, motivation, engagement, depression, anxiety, relationship theory, user-technology relationship, emotion measurement, behavior change, user needs mapping, grounded theory, technology acceptance
MeSH terms
Humans, Health Behavior, Telemedicine, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review