Cited by 136Social Robot Interaction and HRIAI in Service InteractionsVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Second Chance to Make a First Impression? How Appearance and Nonverbal Behavior Affect Perceived Warmth and Competence of Virtual Agents over Time

Open access
Bergmann, Kirsten, Eyssel, Friederike, Kopp, Stefan·2012·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-33197-8_13

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Bailenson, J.N., Swinth, K., Hoyt, C., Persky, S., Dimov, A., Blascovich, J.: The independent and interactive effects of embodied-agent appearance and behavior on self-report, cognitive, and behavioral markers of copresence in immersive virtual environments. Presence 14(4), 379–393 (2005) · DOI
  2. Bente, G., Krämer, N.C., Jan Peter de Ruiter, A.P.: Computer animated movement and person perception: Methodological advances in nonverbal behavior research. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 25(3), 151–166 (2001) · DOI
  3. Bergmann, K., Kopp, S.: GNetIc – Using Bayesian Decision Networks for Iconic Gesture Generation. In: Ruttkay, Z., Kipp, M., Nijholt, A., Vilhjálmsson, H.H. (eds.) IVA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5773, pp. 76–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2009) · DOI
  4. Bergmann, K., Kopp, S.: Increasing expressiveness for virtual agents–Autonomous generation of speech and gesture in spatial description tasks. In: Decker, K., Sichman, J., Sierra, C., Castelfranchi, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 361–368 (2009)
  5. Bergmann, K., Kopp, S., Eyssel, F.: Individualized gesturing outperforms average gesturing – evaluating gesture production in virtual humans. In: Allbeck, J., Badler, N., Bickmore, T., Pelachaud, C., Safonova, A. (eds.) IVA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6356, pp. 104–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) · DOI
  6. Bickmore, T., Cassell, J.: Social dialogue with embodied conversational agents. In: van Kuppevelt, J., Dybkjaer, L., Bernsen, N. (eds.) Advances in Natural, Multimodal Dialogue Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2005)
  7. Brooks, R.: Humanoid robots. Communications of the ACM 45(3), 33–38 (2002) · DOI
  8. Buisine, S., Martin, J.C.: The effects of speech-gesture cooperation in animated agents’ behavior in multimedia presentations. Interacting with Computers 19, 484–493 (2007) · DOI
  9. Cassell, J., Thórisson, K.: The power of a nod and a glance: Envelope vs. emotional feedback in animated conversational agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence 13, 519–538 (1999) · DOI · Paper page
  10. Cuddy, A.J., Glick, P., Beninger, A.: The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 31, 73–98 (2011) · DOI
  11. Dautenhahn, K.: Robots as social actors: Aurora and the case of autism. In: Proceedings of the Third International Cognitive Technology Conference (1999)
  12. Garau, M., Slater, M., Vinayagamoorthy, V., Brogni, A., Steed, A., Sasse, M.A.: The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 529–536 (2003) · DOI · Paper page
  13. Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., Powers, A.: Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: Proceedingsof the 12th IEEE Workshop om Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2003)
  14. Heylen, D., van Es, I., Nijholt, A., van Dijk, B.: Experimenting with the gaze of a conversational agent. In: Proceedings International CLASS Workshop on Natural, Intelligent and Effective Interaction in Multimodal Dialogue Systems, pp. 93–100 (2002)
  15. Hinds, P.J., Roberts, T.L., Jones, H.: Whose job is it anyway? a study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human Computer Interaction 19(1), 151–181 (2004) · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hoffmann, L., Krämer, N.C., Lam-chi, A., Kopp, S.: Media Equation Revisited: Do Users Show Polite Reactions towards an Embodied Agent? In: Ruttkay, Z., Kipp, M., Nijholt, A., Vilhjálmsson, H.H. (eds.) IVA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5773, pp. 159–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2009) · DOI
  17. Komatsu, T., Kurosawa, R., Yamada, S.: Difference between users’ expectations and perceptions about a robotic agent (adaptation gap) affect their behaviors. In: Proceedings of the HRI 2011 Workshop Expectations in Intuitive Human-robot Interaction (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  18. Krämer, N.C., Tietz, B., Bente, G.: Effects of Embodied Interface Agents and Their Gestural Activity. In: Rist, T., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Rickel, J. (eds.) IVA 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2792, pp. 292–300. Springer, Heidelberg (2003) · DOI
  19. Krämer, N.C.: Soziale Wirkungen virtueller Helfer–Gestaltung und Evaluation von Mensch-Computer Interaktion. Verlag W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart (2008) · DOI
  20. Mori, M.: The Buddha in the robot. Charles E. Tuttle Co., Tokyo (1982)
  21. Niewiadomski, R., Demeure, V., Pelachaud, C.: Warmth, competence, believability and virtual agents. In: Allbeck, J., Badler, N., Bickmore, T., Pelachaud, C., Safonova, A. (eds.) IVA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6356, pp. 272–285. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) · DOI
  22. Nishio, S., Ishiguro, H.: Attitude change induced by different appearances of interaction agents. International Journal of Machine Consciousness 3(1), 115–126 (2011) · DOI
  23. Peplau, L., Taylor, S., Sears, D.: Social Psychology. Prentice Hall (2005)
  24. Rehm, M., André, E.: Informing the design of agents by corpus analysis. In: Nishida, T., Nakano, Y. (eds.) Conversational Informatics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2007)
  25. Schröder, M., Trouvain, J.: The German text-to-speech synthesis system MARY: A tool for research, development and teaching. International Journal of Speech Technology 6, 365–377 (2003) · DOI
  26. Skowronski, J., Amady, N. (eds.): First Impressions. The Guilford Press (2008)
  27. Sträfling, N., Fleischer, I., Polzer, C., Leutner, D., Krämer, N.C.: Teaching learning strategies with a pedagogical agent: The effects of a virtual tutor and its appearance on learning and motivation. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications 22(2), 73–83 (2010) · DOI
  28. Woods, S., Dautenhahn, K., Schulz, J.: The design space of robots: Investigating children’s views. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 47–52 (2004) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 136

Metadata

Authors
Bergmann, K., Eyssel, F., & Kopp, S.
Affiliations
Bielefeld University (DE)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2012
Pages
126-138
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W83463411
Cited by
136
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
5.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
virtual agents, first impressions, second chances, perceived warmth, perceived competence, nonverbal behavior, gesture, agent appearance, social cognition, time effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review