Quantum generalisation of feedforward neural networks
Open accessAbstract
We propose a quantum generalisation of a classical neural network. The classical neurons are firstly rendered reversible by adding ancillary bits. Then they are generalised to being quantum reversible, i.e., unitary (the classical networks we generalise are called feedforward, and have step-function activation functions). The quantum network can be trained efficiently using gradient descent on a cost function to perform quantum generalisations of classical tasks. We demonstrate numerically that it can: (i) compress quantum states onto a minimal number of qubits, creating a quantum autoencoder, and (ii) discover quantum communication protocols such as teleportation. Our general recipe is theoretical and implementation-independent. The quantum neuron module can naturally be implemented photonically.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper proposes a quantum generalisation of classical feedforward neural networks by making classical neurons reversible with ancillary bits and then unitary, allowing coherent processing of quantum inputs. It numerically demonstrates a quantum autoencoder and a network that discovers the teleportation protocol, and sketches a photonic implementation.
Key findings
- The quantum network can be trained by global gradient descent on a cost function based on local Pauli expectation values, and the number of weights grows polynomially in the number of neurons.
- As a quantum autoencoder, it compresses quantum states onto fewer qubits: for inputs \((|00\rangle+|11\rangle)/\sqrt{2}\) and \((|00\rangle-|11\rangle)/\sqrt{2}\), the cost function converged to zero, and qualitatively identical convergence was obtained for other orthogonal 2-qubit inputs and for 3 input qubits with 1 bottleneck qubit.
- For two non-orthogonal inputs and a 1-qubit bottleneck, the cost function does not converge to zero, but training yields an approximately compressing unitary.
- The network discovered the teleportation protocol: after training, testing on 1000 states randomly picked from the Haar measure gave a cost-function distribution with mean \(5.0371 \times 10^{-4}\) and standard deviation \(1.7802 \times 10^{-4}\), described as effectively zero.
Methods
- Theoretical construction: classical feedforward neurons with Heaviside activation are first made reversible by adding ancillary bits, then generalised to unitary quantum neurons; classical copying is replaced by a general 2-qubit “fan-out” unitary \(U_F\).
- Training: global gradient descent on a quantum cost function using local Pauli expectation values, with parameters \(\alpha_{j_1,\dots,j_N}\) in the unitary parametrisation; numerical simulations were run for the autoencoder and teleportation tasks.
- Photonic implementation: a neuron module is designed using the Cerf-Adami-Kwiat protocol, encoding one qubit in polarisation and others in spatial modes, with variable beamsplitters, phase shifters, and polarisation rotators.
Limitations
- The paper states it does not prove that convergence to zero cost, where possible, will always take a number of iterations growing polynomially in the number of neurons.
- The paper states that classical simulation of quantum systems is generally inefficient, so efficiency claims refer to physical quantum implementation.
- The paper states the single-photon photonic scheme does not scale well because the number of spatial modes grows exponentially in the number of qubits; it also notes that omitting ancillary qubits can sacrifice classical-mode performance.
- Evident from the text: the demonstrations are numerical simulations, and the data availability statement says this is a theoretical paper with no experimental data beyond the described numerical simulation data.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 24 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning
In the reversible generalisation, the output is a function of the inputs and a discrete set of permutation matrices, not of continuous weights.
“In the reversible generalisation, where each neuron is replaced by a permutation matrix, we find that the output is no longer a function of the inputs and continuous weights, but rather of the inputs and a discrete set of permutation matrices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Entanglement between different neurons is needed to perform the autoencoder task.
“However when investigating applications of the network we realised that there are scenarios (the autoencoder in particular) where entanglement between different neurons is needed to perform the task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The quantum network can compress quantum states onto a minimal number of qubits, creating a quantum autoencoder.
“We demonstrate numerically that it can: (i) compress quantum states onto a minimal number of qubits, creating a quantum autoencoder”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The number of evaluations of the cost function for a given iteration of gradient descent grows polynomially in the number of neurons.
“Thus the number of evaluations of the cost function for a given iteration of the gradient descent grows polynomially in the number of neurons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In training with a variety of two possible orthogonal input states including superposition states, the cost function of the quantum autoencoder converged towards zero through global gradient descent in every case, starting with uniformly randomised weights.
“In training with a variety of two possible orthogonal input states including superposition states, the cost function of the quantum autoencoder converged towards zero through global gradient descent in every case, starting with uniformly randomised weights, α j1;:::;jN 2 À1; 1 ½ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
The training was found to be successful, i.e., the cost function converged towards zero.
“As can be seen, the training was found to be successful, i.e., the cost function converged towards zero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A fully trained network can teleport the state ψ from Alice to the output port of qubit 6 (to Bob).
“A fully trained network can teleport the state ψ j i (from Alice) to the output port of qubit 6 (to Bob).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Qualitatively identical graphs of the cost function converging to 0 were also obtained for other examples of 2 orthogonal input states, including for the case of 3 input qubits and 1 bottleneck qubit.
“Qualitatively identical graphs of the cost function converging to 0 were also obtained for other examples of 2 orthogonal input states, including for the case of 3 input qubits and 1 bottleneck qubit”
- Also stated in: § Quantum photonics neuron module · plain
“Qualitatively identical graphs of the cost function converging to 0 were also obtained for other examples of 2 orthogonal input states, including for the case of 3 input qubits and 1 bottleneck qubit”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Quantum photonics neuron module · plain
- Findingown data
Figure 2c shows the network learning to compress in the case of two possible inputs: (|00>+|11>)/√2 and (|00>-|11>)/√2.
“Figure 2c shows the network learning to compress in the case of two possible inputs: 00 j i þ 11 j i ð Þ = ffiffi ffi 2 p and 00 j i À 11 j i ð Þ = ffiffi ffi 2 p .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
This held for all tests with randomly initialised weights.
“This held for all tests with randomly initialised weights.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The quantum network can discover quantum communication protocols such as teleportation.
“and (ii) discover quantum communication protocols such as teleportation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The cost function can be seen to converge to zero.
“The cost function can be seen to converge to zero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Some 2-bit-in-1-bit-out functions implemented by a classical neuron require 3 bits to be made reversible by adding a dummy input bit.
“in particular, some of the '2 bits in -1 bit out' functions the neuron can implement require 3 bits to be made reversible in this manner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Feynman, R. P. Quantum mechanical computers. Found. Phys. 16, 507531 (1986). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
A classical reversible gate can be generalised to a quantum unitary such that the final output qubit is the output of interest.
“Generalise the classical reversible gate to a quantum unitary taking input ψ in j i 1;2;:::;n 0 j i !ψ out j i 1;2;:::;n;out , such that the final output qubit is the output of interest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The quantum neuron can simulate any classical neuron as defined above.
“This way the quantum neuron can simulate any classical neuron as defined above.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A CNOT can copy a qubit in the classical computational basis: |b>|0> -> |b>|b> for |b> in {|0>,|1>}.
“For a 2-qubit case, one can use a CNOT for example to copy in the classical computational basis 30 : b j i 0 j i ! b j i b j i, if b j i 2 0 j i; 1 j i f g”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Feynman, R. P. Quantum mechanical computers. Found. Phys. 16, 507531 (1986). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Gradient descent has been achieved using Heaviside activation functions by taking the weights as Gaussian variables and taking partial derivatives with respect to the means and standard deviations.
“Nevertheless, gradient descent has also been achieved using Heaviside activation functions, by taking the weights as Gaussian variables and taking partial derivatives w.r.t. the means and standard deviations of the appropriate Gaussian distributions.33,34”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] Bartlett, P. L. & Downs, T. Using random weights to train multilayer networks of hard-limiting units. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 3, 202–210 (1992). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Downs, T. & Gaynier, R. J. The use of random weights for the training of multilayer networks of neurons with heaviside characteristics. Math. Comput. Model. 22, 53–61 (1995). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the quantum case, the no-cloning theorem prevents copying a quantum state in the most naive way.
“In the quantum case the no-cloning theorem shows one cannot do this in the most naive way.20”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Classical neurons can be rendered reversible by adding ancillary bits.
“The classical neurons are firstly rendered reversible by adding ancillary bits.”
- Also stated in: § Quantum neural networks · plain
“For an n-input classical neuron having (in 1 , in 2 , ..., in n ) → out, create a classical reversible gate taking (in 1 , in 2 , ..., in n , 0) → (in 1 , in 2 , ..., in n , out).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [30] Feynman, R. P. Quantum mechanical computers. Found. Phys. 16, 507531 (1986). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [31] Muthukrishnan, A. Classical and Quantum Logic Gates: An Introduction to Quantum Computing. Rochester Center for Quantum Information (online seminar notes). Retrieved from http://www.optics.rochester.edu/~stroud/presentations/muthukrishnan991/LogicGates.pdf (1999).
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Quantum neural networks · plain
- Premisecitation
Any classical reversible gate of the form (in1,...,inn,0)->(in1,...,inn,out) can be represented by a permutation matrix.
“Such an operation can always be represented by a permutation matrix.31”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Muthukrishnan, A. Classical and Quantum Logic Gates: An Introduction to Quantum Computing. Rochester Center for Quantum Information (online seminar notes). Retrieved from http://www.optics.rochester.edu/~stroud/presentations/muthukrishnan991/LogicGates.pdf (1999).
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The general 2-qubit fan-out unitary U_F does not in general copy quantum states that are non-orthogonal.
“As this unitary does not in general copy quantum states that are non-orthogonal we call it a 'fan-out' operation rather than a copying operation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Making individual neurons reversible and then quantum reversible (unitary) resolves the classical-quantum clash.
“We make the individual neurons reversible and then naturally generalise them to being quantum reversible (unitary).This resolves the classical-quantum clash mentioned above from ref. 24.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Schuld, M., Sinayskiy, I. & Petruccione, F. The quest for a quantum neural network. Quant. Inf. Process. 13, 25672586 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The training procedure is efficient in the sense that the number of cost function evaluations per iteration grows polynomially in the number of neurons.
“The training procedure is efficient in this sense.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A key challenge to overcome is the clash between the nonlinear, dissipative dynamics of neural network computing and the linear, reversible dynamics of quantum computing.
“A key challenge to overcome is the clash between the nonlinear, dissipative dynamics of neural network computing and the linear, reversible dynamics of quantum computing.24”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Schuld, M., Sinayskiy, I. & Petruccione, F. The quest for a quantum neural network. Quant. Inf. Process. 13, 25672586 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
There are numerous quantum tasks the quantum network can do that the classical network cannot.
“Thus, there are numerous quantum tasks it can do that the classical network cannot, including the two examples above.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Adding ancillary qubits ensures that the network is a strict generalisation of the classical network.
“While adding the ancillary qubits ensures that the network is a strict generalisation of the classical network, it can of course be experimentally and numerically simpler to omit these.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The proposed quantum neural network structure can, on its own, work out the standard protocol for quantum teleportation.
“We propose a quantum neural network structure that can, on its own, work out the standard protocol for quantum teleportation.20”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The quantum network can take and process quantum inputs, for example processing |+> and |-> differently.
“A key type of quantum supremacy is that the quantum network can take and process quantum inputs: it can for example process þ j i and À j i differently.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Once trained properly, ρ_out1 will no longer be ψψ†, as the teleportation has 'messed up' Alice's state.
“Once trained properly, ρ out1 will no longer be ψ j i ψ h j, as the teleportation has 'messed up' Alice's state.37”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Wilde, M. M. Quantum Information Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The quantum network can be trained efficiently using gradient descent on a cost function to perform quantum generalisations of classical tasks.
“The quantum network can be trained efficiently using gradient descent on a cost function to perform quantum generalisations of classical tasks.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“An efficient training method is identified: global gradient descent for a quantum generalisation of the cost function, a function evaluating how close the outputs are to the desired outputs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Simulation of quantum systems with a classical computer is, with the best known methods, in general inefficient.
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
- Premisecitation
Photodetectors are able to reach reset times in the tens of nanoseconds.
“While it appears that this effect will be the limiting factor in terms of speed, photodetectors are able to reach reset times in the tens of nanoseconds, while the production of single photons through parametric down conversion has megahertz repetition rates.46”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Bonneau, D. et al. Fast path and polarization manipulation of telecom wavelength single photons in lithium niobate waveguide devices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 053601 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Taking into account that each step requires approximately 1000 repetitions, around 300 for each of the three Pauli measurements, a learning task could be completed in the order of seconds.
“Taking into account that each step requires approximately 1000 repetitions, around 300 for each of the three Pauli measurements, a learning task could be completed in the order of seconds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Our tuning only requires (in the region of) a few thousand steps.
“For many applications this would be considered slow, but our tuning only requires (in the region of) a few thousand steps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In such a single photon scenario they do not scale well.
“In such a single photon scenario they do not scale well however.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The number of spatial modes grows exponentially in the number of qubits.
“The number of spatial modes grows exponentially in the number of qubits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The production of single photons through parametric down conversion has megahertz repetition rates.
“While it appears that this effect will be the limiting factor in terms of speed, photodetectors are able to reach reset times in the tens of nanoseconds, while the production of single photons through parametric down conversion has megahertz repetition rates.46”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Bonneau, D. et al. Fast path and polarization manipulation of telecom wavelength single photons in lithium niobate waveguide devices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 053601 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
- May combine two claims. 14
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenA simpler and less general form of U_N has been sufficient for the tasks discussed in this paper.
“A simpler and less general form of U N has been sufficient for the tasks discussed in this paper:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFor two non-orthogonal inputs and a 1-qubit bottleneck, the cost function will not converge to zero, but training results in an approximately compressing unitary.
“For two non-orthogonal inputs and a 1-qubit bottleneck the cost-function will not converge to zero as is to be expected, but the training rather results in an approximately compressing unitary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFigure 3b shows the convergence of the cost function during training, simulated on a classical computer.
“Figure 3b shows the convergence of the cost function during training, simulated on a classical computer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe number of weights grows polynomially in the number of neurons.
“It is important to note that the number of weights grow polynomially in the number of neurons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe cost function can be seen to converge to zero, showing that the network has learned to compress the input state onto one qubit and then later recreate the input state.
“The cost function can be seen to converge to zero, showing that the network has learned to compress the input state onto one qubit and then later recreate the input state.”
- Also stated in: § Quantum photonics neuron module · plain
“The cost function can be seen to converge to zero, showing that the network has learned to compress the input state onto one qubit and then later recreate the input state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Quantum photonics neuron module · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe network now teleports any qubit state: picking 1000 states at random from the Haar measure gives a cost function distribution with mean 5.0371 × 10 -4 and standard deviation 1.7802 × 10 -4 , which is effectively zero.
“The network now teleports any qubit state: picking 1000 states at random from the Haar measure (uniform distribution over the Bloch sphere) gives a cost function distribution with mean 5.0371 × 10 -4 and standard deviation 1.7802 × 10 -4 , which is effectively zero”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAny unitary matrix U can be expressed as U = e^{iH}, where H is a Hermitian matrix, and such matrices can be written as linear combinations of tensor products of the Pauli matrices and the identity.
“Given that any unitary matrix U can be expressed as U = e iH , where H is a Hermitian matrix, 20 and that such matrices can be written as linear combinations of tensor products of the Pauli matrices and the identity, it follows that a general N-qubit unitary can be expressed as”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe unitaries can be parametrised by continuous variables, which allows the application of gradient descent.
“This means that the unitaries can be parametrised by continuous variables, which once again allows the application of gradient descent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenFor a gate with n inputs and outputs, there exist an infinite number of unitaries, in contrast with the discrete set of permutation matrices.
“However, in the generalisation to unitaries, for a gate with n inputs and outputs, there exist an infinite number of unitaries, in contrast with the discrete set of permutation matrices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningAny irreversible classical computation can be recovered as a special case from reversible classical computation, and reversible classical computation from quantum computation.
“The generalisation recipe summarised in Fig. 1 also illustrates how any irreversible classical computation can be recovered as a special case from reversible classical computation (by ignoring the dummy and copied bits), which in turn can be recovered as a special case from quantum computation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIn the classical mode of operation, where the total density matrix state is diagonal in the computational basis, only σ3 will have non-zero expectation, and the cost function becomes the same as in the classical case up to a simple transformation.
“We note in the classical mode of operation, where the total density matrix state is diagonal in the computational basis, only σ 3 will have non-zero expectation, and the cost function becomes the same as in the classical case (Eq.( 2)) up to a simple transformation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe classical networks correspond to a particular parameter regime for the quantum networks.
“The comparison of classical and quantum neural networks is well-defined within our set-up, as the classical networks correspond to a particular parameter regime for the quantum networks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe same scheme can be used to make quantum generalisations of networks whose generalised neurons have more inputs/outputs and connections.
“The same scheme can be used to make quantum generalisations of networks whose generalised neurons have more inputs/outputs and connections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe networks are strict generalisations of the classical networks, providing a clear framework for comparing the power of quantum and classical neural networks.
“Moreover they are strict generalisations of the classical networks, providing a clear framework for comparing the power of quantum and classical neural networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe number of neurons in a given hidden layer for a classical neuron will not exceed j_max.
“The number of neurons in a given hidden layer for a classical neuron will not exceed j max .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIf one wishes the number of free parameters of a neuron to grow no more than polynomially in the number of inputs, one needs to restrict the unitary.
“If one wishes the number of free parameters of a neuron to grow no more than polynomially in the number of inputs, one needs to restrict the unitary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenOne can force the compressed output to be diagonal in a particular basis by adding an extra term to the cost function.
“One can force the compressed output to be diagonal in a particular basis by adding an extra term to the cost-function (e.g., desiring the expectation values of Pauli X and Y to be zero in the case of a single qubit will push the network to give an output diagonal in the Z-basis).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe quantum neuron module can naturally be implemented photonically.
“The quantum neuron module can naturally be implemented photonically.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe C-A-K scheme and related ones are experimentally viable, theoretically clean and can implement any unitary on a single photon spread out over spatial modes.
“This scheme and related ones such as in refs.41, 42 are experimentally viable, theoretically clean and can implement any unitary on a single photon spread out over spatial modes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [41] Reck, M., Zeilinger, A., Bernstein, H. J. & Bertani, P. Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 58–61 (1994). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Clements, W. R., Humphreys, P. C., Metcalf, B. J., Kolthammer, W. S. & Walmsley, I. A. An optimal design for universal multiport interferometers. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.08788 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationQuantum photonics is an attractive platform for QIP: it has room temperature operation, the possibility of robust miniaturisation through photonic integrated circuits; in general it harnesses the highly developed optical fibre-related technology for QIP purposes.
“This is an attractive platform for QIP: it has room temperature operation, the possibility of robust miniaturisation through photonic integrated circuits; in general it harnesses the highly developed optical fibre-related technology for QIP purposes.38”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Rudolph, T. Why I am optimistic about the silicon-photonic route to quantum computing. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.08535 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe tuning can be naturally implemented in the proposed photonic platform.
“A final motivation for choosing this platform is that the tuning can be naturally implemented, as detailed below.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe networks generalise classical neural networks to the quantum case in a similar sense to how quantum computing generalises classical computing.
“The networks generalise classical neural networks to the quantum case in a similar sense to how quantum computing generalises classical computing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOptical implementations have been viewed as optimal for neural networks, in the classical case, due to the low design cost of adding multiple connections (as light passes through light without interacting).
“Moreover optical implementations have been viewed as optimal for neural networks, in the classical case, due to the low design cost of adding multiple connections (as light passes through light without interacting).39”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Rojas, R. Neural Networks (Springer, 1996). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOmitting ancillary qubits sacrifices performance in the classical mode of operation, and the network may not be as good as a classical network with the same number of neurons for all tasks.
“Then one would sacrifice performance in the classical mode of operation, and the network may not be as good as a classical network with the same number of neurons for all tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe non-monotonic decrease is to be expected as we are varying the input states.
“The non-monotonic decrease is to be expected as we are varying the input states.”
- Also stated in: § Quantum photonics neuron module · plain
“The non-monotonic decrease is to be expected as we are varying the input states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Quantum photonics neuron module · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThis circuit can be made more robust and miniaturised using silicon or silica optical waveguides.
“This circuit can be made more robust and miniaturised using silicon or silica optical waveguides.38”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Rudolph, T. Why I am optimistic about the silicon-photonic route to quantum computing. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.08535 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationConventionally phase shifters built upon the electro-optic effect are known to work in the megahertz region and have extremely low loss.
“Conventionally phase shifters built upon the electro-optic effect are known to work in the megahertz region and have extremely low loss.38”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Rudolph, T. Why I am optimistic about the silicon-photonic route to quantum computing. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.08535 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSilicon waveguides are birefringent.
“this may have additional difficulties in that silicon waveguides are birefringent.44”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Humphreys, P. C. et al. Strain-optic active control for quantum integrated photonics. Opt. Express 22, 21719–21726 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSilicon or silica optical waveguides have been extensively used to control spatial modes and recently also polarisation.
“They have been extensively used to control spatial modes and recently also polarisation.45”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Sansoni, L. et al. Polarization entangled state measurement on a chip. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 200503 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe standard teleportation protocol allows only classical communication of 2 bits.
“The standard teleportation protocol allows only classical communication of 2 bits 20 ; this is enforced by only allowing two connections, which are dephased in the Z-basis (D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Simulation of quantum systems with a classical computer is, with the best known methods, in general inefficient.
“Note also that the statements about the efficiency of the training procedure refer to the physical implementation with quantum technology: the simulation of quantum systems with a classical computer is, with the best known methods, in general inefficient.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Several labs can implement the phase shifting via heaters or the electro-optic effect.
“Several labs can implement the phase shifting via heaters or the electro-optic effect.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The quantum kernel trick has been demonstrated experimentally using an ensemble of nuclear spins.
“Finally, the quantum kernel trick, which means that the dimensions of the quantumenhanced feature space are larger than the number of data sets, has been demonstrated experimentally by using an ensemble nuclear spins [162].”
From Variational quantum algorithms (2021) · cites this paper as [162]
The Quantum neural networks section describes a teleportation-training result simulated on a classical computer, while the Quantum photonics neuron module section proposes an optical design. Searches for “quantum kernel trick” and “ensemble of nuclear spins” found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed experimental demonstration. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Two different references have the same arXiv identifier
MinorReferences 23 and 36 give the same arXiv identifier for works with different authors and titles.
“23. Wiebe, N., Kapoor, A. & Svore, K. M. Quantum deep learning. Preprint at https:// arxiv.org/abs/1303.5904 (2015).”
“36. Hedemann, S. R. Hyperspherical parameterization of unitary matrices. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5904 (2013).”
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126 · see citing works
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,449 · see citing works
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880 · see citing works
Biamonte, J., Wittek, P., Pancotti, N., Rebentrost, P., Wiebe, N., & Lloyd, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23474 · Cited by 4,779 · see citing works
Quantum Algorithm for Linear Systems of Equations
Harrow, A. W., Hassidim, A., & Lloyd, S. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.150502 · Cited by 3,325 · see citing works
Representation theory of finite groups and associative algebras
Curtis, C. W., & Reiner, I. (1964) · USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/0041-5553(64)90132-6 · Cited by 2,718 · see citing works
Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator
Reck, M., Zeilinger, A., Bernstein, H. J., & Bertani, P. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.73.58 · Cited by 2,155 · see citing works
Quantum Support Vector Machine for Big Data Classification
Rebentrost, P., Mohseni, M., & Lloyd, S. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.130503 · Cited by 1,951 · see citing works
Feynman, R. P. (1986) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01886518 · Cited by 1,770 · see citing works
Quantum principal component analysis
Lloyd, S., Mohseni, M., & Rebentrost, P. (2014) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3029 · Cited by 1,385 · see citing works
An introduction to quantum machine learning
Schuld, M., Sinayskiy, I., & Petruccione, F. (2015) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/00107514.2014.964942 · Cited by 1,381 · see citing works
Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers
Clements, W. R., Humphreys, P. C., Metcalf, B. J., Kolthammer, W. S., & Walsmley, I. A. (2016) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.3.001460 · Cited by 1,216 · see citing works
Wilde, M. M. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139525343 · Cited by 1,138 · see citing works
Quantum State Tomography via Compressed Sensing
Gross, D., Liu, Y.-K., Flammia, S. T., Becker, S., & Eisert, J. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.150401 · Cited by 1,099 · see citing works
Feynman, R. P. (1985) · Optics News · doi:10.1364/on.11.2.000011 · Cited by 1,023 · see citing works
Representation Theory of Finite Groups and Associative Algebras.
Linton, F. E. J., Curtis, C. W., & Reiner, I. (1965) · American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2311038 · Cited by 990 · see citing works
Rojas, R. (1996) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61068-4 · Cited by 810 · see citing works
The quest for a Quantum Neural Network
Schuld, M., Sinayskiy, I., & Petruccione, F. (2014) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-014-0809-8 · Cited by 671 · see citing works
Fujii, K. (2009) · Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers eBooks · doi:10.1109/9780470544907.ch24 · Cited by 642 · see citing works
Aaronson, S. (2015) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3272 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Quantum algorithms for supervised and unsupervised machine learning
Lloyd, S., Mohseni, M., & Rebentrost, P. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1307.0411 · Cited by 542 · see citing works
Quantum Algorithm for Data Fitting
Wiebe, N., Braun, D., & Lloyd, S. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.050505 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Quantum-Enhanced Machine Learning
Dunjko, V., Taylor, J. M., & Briegel, H. J. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.130501 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Neural Network Time Series: Forecasting of Financial Markets
Azoff, E. M. (1994) · Cited by 442 · see citing works
An introduction to quantum machine learningPreprint
Schuld, M., Sinayskiy, I., & Petruccione, F. (2014) · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Why I am optimistic about the silicon-photonic route to quantum computing
Rudolph, T. (2017) · APL Photonics · doi:10.1063/1.4976737 · Cited by 350 · cited 4× · see citing works
“, accepting probabilistic gates in the spirit of the KLM scheme,(43) or using measurement-based cluster state quantum computation approaches.(38) Before describing the module we make the simplifying restriction that there is one input qubit to the neuron and one dummy input.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOptical simulation of quantum logic
Cerf, N. J., Adami, C., & Kwiat, P. G. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.r1477 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Neural network time series forecasting of financial markets
Meade, N. (1995) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/s0169-2070(95)90005-5 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
A quantum annealing architecture with all-to-all connectivity from local interactions
Lechner, W., Hauke, P., & Zoller, P. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500838 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Polarization Entangled State Measurement on a Chip
Sansoni, L., Sciarrino, F., Vallone, G., Mataloni, P., Crespi, A., Ramponi, R., & Osellame, R. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.200503 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Quantum algorithms for topological and geometric analysis of data
Lloyd, S., Garnerone, S., & Zanardi, P. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10138 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Quantum versus classical annealing of Ising spin glasses
Heim, B., Rønnow, T. F., Isakov, S. V., & Troyer, M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa4170 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Optimal quantum learning of a unitary transformation
Bisio, A., Chiribella, G., D’Ariano, G. M., Facchini, S., & Perinotti, P. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.032324 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Uttam, S. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385491-9.00012-5 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Quantum learning and universal quantum matching machine
Sasaki, M., & Carlini, A. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.022303 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Adiabatic Quantum Algorithm for Search Engine Ranking
Garnerone, S., Zanardi, P., & Lidar, D. A. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.230506 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Bonneau, D., Lobino, M., Jiang, P., Natarajan, C. M., Tanner, M. G., Hadfield, R. H., Dorenbos, S. N., Zwiller, V., Thompson, M. G., & O’Brien, J. L. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.053601 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Learning in quantum control: High-dimensional global optimization for noisy quantum dynamics
Palittapongarnpim, P., Wittek, P., Zahedinejad, E., Vedaie, S. S., & Sanders, B. C. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.12.087 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Advances in quantum machine learningPreprint
Adcock, J. C., Allen, E. J., Day, M., Frick, S., Hinchliff, J. J., Johnson, M., Morley-Short, S., Pallister, S., Price, A. B., & Stanisic, S. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.02900 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Polarization entangled states measurement on a chip
Sansoni, L., Sciarrino, F., Vallone, G., Mataloni, P., Crespi, A., Ramponi, R., & Osellame, R. (2011) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.886485 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Quantum Pattern Matching Fast on Average
Montanaro, A. (2017) · Algorithmica · doi:10.1007/s00453-015-0060-4 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Quantum gate learning in qubit networks: Toffoli gate without time-dependent control
Banchi, L., Pancotti, N., & Bose, S. (2016) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/npjqi.2016.19 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Neural Networks and Deep Learning
Efron, B., & Hastie, T. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108914062.023 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Using random weights to train multilayer networks of hard-limiting units
Barlett, P. L., & Downs, T. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.125861 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Quantum learning of coherent states
Sentís, G., Guţǎ, M., & Adesso, G. (2015) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-015-0030-4 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Wittek, P. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800953-6.00002-5 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
A framework for phase and interference in generalized probabilistic theories
Garner, A. J. P., Dahlsten, O., Nakata, Y., Murao, M., & Vedral, V. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/9/093044 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationStrain-optic active control for quantum integrated photonics
Humphreys, P. C., Metcalf, B. J., Spring, J. B., Moore, M., Salter, P. S., Booth, M. J., Steven Kolthammer, W., & Walmsley, I. A. (2014) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.22.021719 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Downs, T., & Gaynier, R. J. (1995) · Mathematical and Computer Modelling · doi:10.1016/0895-7177(95)00180-a · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Hyperspherical Parameterization of Unitary MatricesPreprint
Hedemann, S. R. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1303.5904 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
(2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800953-6.00015-3 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Why I am optimistic about the silicon-photonic route to quantum computingPreprint
Rudolph, T. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.08535 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Biamonte, J., Wittek, P., Pancotti, N., Rebentrost, P., Wiebe, N., & Lloyd, S. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.09347
An Optimal Design for Universal Multiport Interferometers
Clements, W. R., Humphreys, P. C., Metcalf, B. J., Kolthammer, W. S., & Walmsley, I. A. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.08788
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hedemann, S. R. Hyperspherical parameterization of unitary matrices. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5904 (2013). · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biamonte, J., Wittek, P., Pancotti, N., Rebentrost, P., Wiebe, N., & Lloyd, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23474 · Cited by 4,779 · see citing works
Variational quantum algorithms
Cerezo, M., Arrasmith, A., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S. C., Endo, S., Fujii, K., McClean, J. R., Mitarai, K., Yuan, X., Cincio, L., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9 · Cited by 3,385 · see citing works
“(See [139, 140] for alternative approaches to quantum autoencoders.”
BackgroundSupervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces
Havlíček, V., Córcoles, A. D., Temme, K., Harrow, A. W., Kandala, A., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0980-2 · Cited by 2,572 · see citing works
Quantum Machine Learning in Feature Hilbert Spaces
Schuld, M., & Killoran, N. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.040504 · Cited by 1,840 · see citing works
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 1,726 · see citing works
Cost function dependent barren plateaus in shallow parametrized quantum circuits
Cerezo, M., Sone, A., Volkoff, T., Cincio, L., & Coles, P. J. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21728-w · Cited by 1,047 · see citing works
Classification with Quantum Neural Networks on Near Term Processors
Farhi, E., & Neven, H. (2020) · doi:10.37686/qrl.v1i2.80 · Cited by 909 · see citing works
Challenges and opportunities in quantum machine learning
Cerezo, M., Verdon, G., Huang, H.-Y., Cincio, Ł., & Coles, P. J. (2022) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-022-00311-3 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
Strategies for quantum computing molecular energies using the unitary coupled cluster ansatz
Romero, J., Babbush, R., McClean, J. R., Hempel, C., Love, P. J., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2019) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aad3e4 · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Training deep quantum neural networks
Beer, K., Bondarenko, D., Farrelly, T., Osborne, T. J., Salzmann, R., Scheiermann, D., & Wolf, R. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14454-2 · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Data re-uploading for a universal quantum classifier
Pérez-Salinas, A., Cervera-Lierta, A., Gil-Fuster, E., & Latorre, J. I. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-02-06-226 · Cited by 713 · see citing works
An optical neural chip for implementing complex-valued neural network
Zhang, H., Gu, M., Jiang, X., Thompson, J. E., Cai, H. N., Paesani, S., Santagati, R., Laing, A., Zhang, Y., Yung, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20719-7 · Cited by 671 · see citing works
A Survey on quantum computing technology
Gyongyosi, L., & Imre, S. (2019) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2018.11.002 · Cited by 646 · see citing works
Hybrid Quantum-Classical Algorithms and Quantum Error Mitigation
Endo, S., Cai, Z., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2021) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.90.032001 · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Quantum machine learning: a classical perspective
Ciliberto, C., Herbster, M., Ialongo, A. D., Pontil, M., Rocchetto, A., Severini, S., & Wossnig, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2017.0551 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training data
Caro, M. C., Huang, H.-Y., Cerezo, M., Sharma, K., Sornborger, A., Cincio, L., & Coles, P. J. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32550-3 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
Continuous-variable quantum neural networks
Killoran, N., Bromley, T. R., Arrazola, J. M., Schuld, M., Quesada, N., & Lloyd, S. (2019) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.1.033063 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
Hierarchical quantum classifiers
Grant, E., Benedetti, M., Cao, S., Hallam, A., Lockhart, J., Stojevic, V., Green, A. G., & Simone Severini, B. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0116-9 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Continuous-variable quantum neural networks
Killoran, N., Bromley, T. R., Arrazola, J. M., Schuld, M., Quesada, N., & Lloyd, S. (2018) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Potential of quantum computing for drug discovery
Cao, Y., Romero, J., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2018) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/jrd.2018.2888987 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Experimental Quantum Generative Adversarial Networks for Image Generation
Huang, H.-L., Du, Y., Gong, M., Zhao, Y., Wu, Y., Wang, C., Li, S., Liang, F., Lin, J., Xu, Y., et al. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.024051 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
An artificial neuron implemented on an actual quantum processor
Tacchino, F., Macchiavello, C., Gerace, D., & Bajoni, D. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0140-4 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Quantum computing for healthcare: a review
Ur Rasool, R., Ahmad, H. F., Rafique, W., Qayyum, A., Qadir, J., & Anwar, Z. (2023) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi15030094 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
The prospects of quantum computing in computational molecular biology
Outeiral, C., Strahm, M., Shi, J., Morris, G. M., Benjamin, S. C., & Deane, C. M. (2021) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1481 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Advanced machine-learning techniques in drug discovery
Elbadawi, M., Gaisford, S., & Basit, A. W. (2020) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2020.12.003 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
A quantum deep convolutional neural network for image recognition
Li, Y., Zhou, R.-G., Xu, R., Luo, J., & Hu, W. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab9f93 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Quantum optical neural networks
Steinbrecher, G. R., Olson, J. P., Englund, D. R., & Carolan, J. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0174-7 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Quantum variational autoencoder
Khoshaman, A., Vinci, W., Denis, B., Andriyash, E., Sadeghi, H., & Amin, M. H. (2018) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aada1f · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Romero, J., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2021) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202000003 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Quantum Hopfield neural network
Rebentrost, P., Bromley, T. R., Weedbrook, C., & Lloyd, S. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.042308 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Quantum generative adversarial network for generating discrete distribution
Situ, H., He, Z., Wang, Y., Li, L., & Zheng, S. (2020) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2020.05.127 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Quantum adversarial machine learning
Lu, S., Duan, L.-M., & Deng, D.-L. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033212 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Quantum machine learning for chemistry and physics
Sajjan, M., Li, J., Selvarajan, R., Sureshbabu, S. H., Kale, S. S., Gupta, R., Singh, V., & Kais, S. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs00203e · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Quantum Neuron: an elementary building block for machine learning on quantum computersPreprint
Cao, Y., Guerreschi, G. G., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.11240 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Qu, Z., Liu, X., & Zheng, M. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2022.3203791 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Machine Learning of Noise-Resilient Quantum Circuits
Cincio, L., Rudinger, K., Sarovar, M., & Coles, P. J. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010324 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Security intrusion detection using quantum machine learning techniques
Kalinin, M., & Krundyshev, V. (2022) · Journal of Computer Virology and Hacking Techniques · doi:10.1007/s11416-022-00435-0 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Quantum Autoencoders to Denoise Quantum Data
Bondarenko, D., & Feldmann, P. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.130502 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Quantum Machine Learning: A tutorial
Martín-Guerrero, J. D., & Lamata, L. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.02.102 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Unitary quantum perceptron as efficient universal approximator
Torrontegui, E., & García-Ripoll, J. J. (2019) · EPL (Europhysics Letters) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/125/30004 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Optimizing quantum optimization algorithms via faster quantum gradient computation
Gilyén, A., Arunachalam, S., & Wiebe, N. (2019) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611975482.87 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Experimental Realization of a Quantum Autoencoder: The Compression of Qutrits via Machine Learning
Pepper, A., Tischler, N., & Pryde, G. J. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.060501 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Gujju, Y., Matsuo, A., & Raymond, R. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.21.067001 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
An introduction to quantum machine learning: from quantum logic to quantum deep learning
Alchieri, L., Badalotti, D., Bonardi, P., & Bianco, S. (2021) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-021-00056-8 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Universal discriminative quantum neural networks
Chen, H., Wossnig, L., Severini, S., Neven, H., & Mohseni, M. (2021) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-020-00025-7 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Basic protocols in quantum reinforcement learning with superconducting circuits
Lamata, L. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01711-6 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Quantum implementation of an artificial feed-forward neural network
Tacchino, F., Barkoutsos, P. K., Macchiavello, C., Tavernelli, I., Gerace, D., & Bajoni, D. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abb8e4 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Biology and medicine in the landscape of quantum advantages
Cordier, B. A., Sawaya, N. P. D., Guerreschi, G. G., & McWeeney, S. K. (2022) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2022.0541 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Quantum ensembles of quantum classifiers
Schuld, M., & Petruccione, F. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-20403-3 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Quantum Machine Learning: A Review and Current Status
Mishra, N., Kapil, M., Rakesh, H. R., Anand, A. K., Mishra, N., Warke, A., Sarkar, S., Dutta, S., Gupta, S., Dash, A. P., et al. (2020) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-5619-7_8 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Quantum Neural Network for Quantum Neural Computing
Zhou, M.-G., Liu, Z.-P., Yin, H.-L., Li, C.-L., Xu, T.-K., & Chen, Z.-B. (2023) · Research · doi:10.34133/research.0134 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
QDNN: deep neural networks with quantum layers
Zhao, C., & Gao, X.-S. (2021) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-021-00046-w · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Low-depth quantum state preparation
Zhang, X., Yung, M., & Yuan, X. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.043200 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Quantum autoencoders via quantum adders with genetic algorithms
Lamata, L., Alvarez-Rodriguez, U., Martín-Guerrero, J. D., Sanz, M., & Solano, E. (2018) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aae22b · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Quantum machine learning for data scientistsPreprint
Kopczyk, D. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.10068 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Quantum Algorithm Design: Techniques and Applications
Shao, C., Yang, L., & Li, H. (2019) · Journal of Systems Science and Complexity · doi:10.1007/s11424-019-9008-0 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Supervised learning with a quantum classifier using multi-level systems
Adhikary, S., Dangwal, S., & Bhowmik, D. (2020) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-020-2587-9 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Advances in Quantum Deep Learning: An OverviewPreprint
Garg, S., & Ramakrishnan, G. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.04316 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Özpolat, Z., & Karabatak, M. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13061099 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
A Leap among Quantum Computing and Quantum Neural Networks: A Survey
Massoli, F. V., Vadicamo, L., Amato, G. M., & Falchi, F. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3529756 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
A co-design framework of neural networks and quantum circuits towards quantum advantage
Jiang, W., Xiong, J., & Shi, Y. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20729-5 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Building quantum neural networks based on a swap test
Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Shao, C., Wu, Y.-C., Guo, G., & Guo, G. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.012334 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Noise-Assisted Quantum Autoencoder
Cao, C., & Wang, X. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.054012 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Quantum machine learning and quantum biomimetics: A perspective
Lamata, L. (2020) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ab9803 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Training Optimization for Gate-Model Quantum Neural Networks
Gyöngyösi, L., & Imre, S. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48892-w · Cited by 57 · see citing works
QuantumFed: A Federated Learning Framework for Collaborative Quantum Training
Xia, Q., & Li, Q. (2021) · Globecom · doi:10.1109/globecom46510.2021.9685012 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Realization of a quantum autoencoder for lossless compression of quantum data
Huang, C.-J., Ma, H., Yin, Q., Tang, J.-F., Dong, D., Chen, C., Xiang, G., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.032412 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Hybrid Quantum-Classical Neural Networks
Arthur, D., & Date, P. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce53715.2022.00023 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Ovalle-Magallanes, E., Alvarado-Carrillo, D. E., Avina‐Cervantes, J. G., Cruz-Aceves, I., & Ruiz-Pinales, J. (2023) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110307 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Quantum Algorithms for Feedforward Neural Networks
Allcock, J., Hsieh, C., Kerenidis, I., & Zhang, S. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3411466 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Quantum Computing and Deep Learning Methods for GDP Growth Forecasting
Alaminos, D., Salas, M. B., & Fernández-Gámez, M. Á. (2021) · Computational Economics · doi:10.1007/s10614-021-10110-z · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Branching quantum convolutional neural networks
MacCormack, I., Delaney, C. P., Galda, A., Aggarwal, N., & Narang, P. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013117 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Resonant quantum principal component analysis
Li, Z., Chai, Z., Guo, Y., Ji, W., Wang, M., Shi, F., Wang, Y., Lloyd, S., & Du, J. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abg2589 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Markovian Quantum Neuroevolution for Machine Learning
Lu, Z., Shen, P.-X., & Deng, D.-L. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.044039 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Detecting and quantifying entanglement on near-term quantum devices
Wang, K., Song, Z., Zhao, X., Wang, Z., & Wang, X. (2022) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00556-w · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Nonlinear quantum neuron: A fundamental building block for quantum neural networks
Yan, S., Qi, H., & Cui, W. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.052421 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
ResQNets: a residual approach for mitigating barren plateaus in quantum neural networks
Kashif, M., & Al-Kuwari, S. M. (2024) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-023-00216-8 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Experimental Quantum Advantage with Quantum Coupon Collector
Zhou, M.-G., Cao, X., Lu, Y.-S., Wang, Y., Bao, Y., Jia, Z.-Y., Fu, Y., Yin, H., & Chen, Z. (2022) · Research · doi:10.34133/2022/9798679 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Resource-efficient high-dimensional subspace teleportation with a quantum autoencoder
Zhang, H., Wan, L., Haug, T., Mok, W., Paesani, S., Shi, Y., Cai, H. N., Chin, L. K., Karim, M. F., Xiao, L., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn9783 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationExperimental Implementation of a Quantum Autoencoder via Quantum Adders
Ding, Y., Lamata, L., Sanz, M., Chen, X., & Solano, E. (2019) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.201800065 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Enhancing quantum adversarial robustness by randomized encodings
Gong, W., Dong, Y., Li, W., & Deng, D.-L. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.023020 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Natural evolutionary strategies for variational quantum computation
Anand, A., Degroote, M., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2021) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abf3ac · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Practical distributed quantum information processing with LOCCNet
Zhao, X., Zhao, B., Wang, Z., Song, Z., & Wang, X. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00496-x · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Hybrid ARMA-GARCH-Neural Networks for intraday strategy exploration in high-frequency trading
Alaminos, D., Salas, M. B., & Ureña, A. P. (2023) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2023.110139 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Design and analysis of quantum machine learning: a survey
Chen, L., Li, T., Chen, Y., Chen, X., Woźniak, M., Xiong, N. N., & Liang, W. (2024) · Connection Science · doi:10.1080/09540091.2024.2312121 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Quantum computing methods for supervised learning
Kulkarni, V., Kulkarni, M., & Pant, A. (2021) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-021-00050-0 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
On quantum ensembles of quantum classifiers
Abbas, A., Schuld, M., & Petruccione, F. (2020) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-020-00018-6 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Hybrid Quantum-Classical Recurrent Neural Networks for Time Series Prediction
Ceschini, A., Rosato, A., & Panella, M. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892441 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Optimal Tuning of Quantum Generative Adversarial Networks for Multivariate Distribution Loading
Agliardi, G., & Prati, E. (2022) · Quantum Reports · doi:10.3390/quantum4010006 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Climate Change Through Quantum Lens: Computing and Machine Learning
Rahman, S. M., Alkhalaf, O. H., Alam, M. S., Tiwari, S. P., Shafiullah, M., Al-Judaibi, S. M., & Al–Ismail, F. S. (2024) · Earth Systems and Environment · doi:10.1007/s41748-024-00411-2 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Universal Adversarial Examples and Perturbations for Quantum Classifiers
Gong, W., & Deng, D.-L. (2021) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwab130 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Anand, A., Romero, J., Degroote, M., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2021) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202000069 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Neural network-based prediction of the secret-key rate of quantum key distribution
Zhou, M.-G., Liu, Z., Liu, W., Li, C., Bai, J.-L., Xue, Y.-R., Fu, Y., Yin, H., & Chen, Z. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-12647-x · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Implementing Any Nonlinear Quantum Neuron
Neto, F. M. D. P., Ludermir, T. B., de Oliveira, W. R., & da Silva, A. J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2019.2938899 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Experimental Quantum Stochastic Walks Simulating Associative Memory of Hopfield Neural Networks
Tang, H. L., Feng, Z., Wang, Y., Lai, P.-C., Wang, C., Ye, Z., Wang, C.-K., Shi, Z.-Y., Wang, T., Chen, Y., et al. (2019) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.11.024020 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Hu, W. (2018) · Natural Science · doi:10.4236/ns.2018.103011 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
A review of Quantum Neural Networks: Methods, Models, Dilemma
Zhao, R., & Wang, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.01840 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
On compression rate of quantum autoencoders: Control design, numerical and experimental realization
Ma, H., Huang, C.-J., Chen, C., Dong, D., Wang, Y., Wu, R.-B., & Xiang, G. (2022) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110659 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Defending Against Byzantine Attacks in Quantum Federated Learning
Xia, Q., Tao, Z., & Li, Q. (2021) · International Conference on Mobility, Sensing and Networking (MSN) · doi:10.1109/msn53354.2021.00035 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The impact of cost function globality and locality in hybrid quantum neural networks on NISQ devices
Kashif, M., & Al-Kuwari, S. M. (2023) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/acb12f · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wan, K. H., Dahlsten, O., Kristjánsson, H., Gardner, R., & Kim, M. S.
- Affiliations
- London Institute for Mathematical Sciences (GB)
- Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dahlsten, Oscar
- Venue
- npj Quantum Information
- Published
- 2017-09-14
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2056-6387 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2560386163
- Semantic Scholar
- d9cfa31d9de66527d719c1511fb2d41b04121dee
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 14.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- npj Quantum Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2014-055)
- Royal Society
- European Commission (618074)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/K034480, EP/K034480/1, K034480/1)
- Division of Mathematical Sciences
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- quantum neural networks, feedforward neural networks, quantum autoencoders, quantum state compression, quantum teleportation, quantum communication protocols, photonics, gradient descent learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review