Cited by 156Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)AI-based Problem Solving and PlanningMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation

Explainable Agency for Intelligent Autonomous Systems

Open access
Langley, Pat, Meadows, Ben, Sridharan, Mohan, Choi, Dongkyu·2017·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

As intelligent agents become more autonomous, sophisti- cated, and prevalent, it becomes increasingly important that humans interact with them effectively. Machine learning is now used regularly to acquire expertise, but common techniques produce opaque content whose behavior is difficult to interpret. Before they will be trusted by humans, autonomous agents must be able to explain their decisions and the reasoning that produced their choices. We will refer to this general ability as explainable agency. This capacity for explaining decisions is not an academic exercise. When a self-driving vehicle takes an unfamiliar turn, its passenger may desire to know its reasons. When a synthetic ally in a computer game blocks a player’s path, he may want to understand its purpose. When an autonomous military robot has abandoned a high-priority goal to pursue another one, its commander may request justification. As robots, vehicles, and synthetic characters become more selfreliant, people will require that they explain their behaviors on demand. The more impressive these agents’ abilities, the more essential that we be able to understand them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v31i2.19108

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langley, P., Meadows, B., Sridharan, M., & Choi, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • University of Kansas (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2017-02-11
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
4762-4763
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W2604602969
Cited by
156
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4
FWCI
9.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Keywords
explainable AI, autonomous agents, decision explanation, human-robot interaction, trust in autonomous systems, autonomous vehicles, model interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review