Cited by 70Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Multi-Agent Systems and NegotiationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Design and Evaluation of Explainable BDI Agents

Harbers, Maaike, van den Bosch, Karel, Meyer, John-Jules·2010·2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that providing explanations is an important capability of intelligent systems. Explanation capabilities are useful, for example, in scenario-based training systems with intelligent virtual agents. Trainees learn more from scenario-based training when they understand why the virtual agents act the way they do. In this paper, we present a model for explainable BDI agents which enables the explanation of BDI agent behavior in terms of underlying beliefs and goals. Different explanation algorithms can be specified in the model, generating different types of explanations. In a user study (n=20), we compare four explanation algorithms by asking trainees which explanations they consider most useful. Based on the results, we discuss which explanation types should be given under what conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/wi-iat.2010.115

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harbers, M., van den Bosch, K., & Meyer, J.-J.
Affiliations
  • Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2010-08
Pages
125-132
OpenAlex
W1972577679
Cited by
70
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT) (publishedVersion)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
BDI agents, belief-desire explanation, scenario-based training, intelligent virtual agents, user study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review