Cited by 30Open Source Software InnovationsDigital Platforms and EconomicsSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices

Trust and Commerce in Open Source — A Contradiction?

Osterloh, Margit, Rota, Sandra, Kuster, Bernhard·2003·Evolaris

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-7091-6088-6_8

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osterloh, M., Rota, S., & Kuster, B.
Venue
Evolaris
Published
2003
Pages
129-141
ISSN
1617-1934 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2492854357
Cited by
30
References
47
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
16.98
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Evolaris (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Keywords
open source software, developer motivation, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, free-riding, trust, swift trust, signaling, software licensing, open source communities, commercialization of open source, public goods, innovation models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review